RPM Fusion update report 2019-03-19
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
audacity-freeworld-2.3.1-1.fc28
ffmpeg-4.0.3-4.fc28
ffmpegthumbs-18.12.3-1.fc28
libtgvoip-2.4.4-1.fc28
telegram-desktop-1.6.0-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
audacity-freeworld-2.3.1-1.fc29
chromium-vaapi-73.0.3683.75-2.fc29
ffmpeg-4.0.3-4.fc29
ffmpegthumbs-18.12.3-1.fc29
freshplayerplugin-0.3.10-1.fc29
libtgvoip-2.4.4-1.fc29
mpd-0.21.6-1.fc29
ppsspp-1.8.0-1.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.6.0-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
k3b-extras-freeworld-18.12.2-1.fc29
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
ffmpeg-3.4.5-3.el7
ppsspp-1.8.0-1.el7
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
lpf-flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
lpf-flash-plugin-32.0.0.156-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
4 years, 2 months
Re: Switching from GCC to llvm-clang for building chromium(vaapi)
by Akarshan Biswas
Hi.
Chromium's debuginfo verbosity can be controlled by a gyp flag
"symbol_level". A value of 0 disables it completely. It didn't failed
because of memory consumption. Memory usage was much lower than GCC. It
failed because exact-debuginfo.sh doesn't support clang(and llvm). I
saw errors.
Regards,
Akarshan Biswas
On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 1:43 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via
rpmfusion-developers <rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org> wrote:
4 years, 2 months
Switching from GCC to llvm-clang for building chromium(vaapi)
by Akarshan Biswas
Hi.
I really like to switch to llvm clang from GCC for building chromium.
Reasons are as follows:
1) The upstream doesn't test with GCC and has switched to llvm - clang
completely(<https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTg4MDI>).
2) Gold linker which supports some flags used by chromium has come to a
deadend. Upstream no longer actively advancing this linker and thus
raising concerns it could begin to suffer from bit-rot. Meanwhile,
Fedora's Looking To Punt It Off Into A Separate Package.
3) Most of the time, the build freezes and later, fails with out of
memory error while building with GCC and GNU ld and sometimes linker
crashes and the build fails.
4) There is a outstanding bug in gold linker for fedora 30 and above. I
have reported to bugzilla but I have no hope to get it fix because of
reasons stated in 1 and 2.
5) This is not an official chromium of Fedora.
With the above stated reasons, I am willing to know your
suggestions/opinions on this. Building with GCC has become quite a
headache for me. If it goes against the packaging rules, I think we can
make an exception for this particular package.
Thank you,
Regards,
Akarshan Biswas
4 years, 2 months
[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
Bug #: 3576
Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software
Studio
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2, 30
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec
Open Broadcaster Software is free and open source software for video recording
and live streaming.
OBS is not in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg and other non free software.
I need to be sponsored as this is my first package and I'm not sponsored in
Fedora.
OBS studio has some issues with placing files in correct location, there was a
discussion about this (https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/391). I think
that all of these errors are related to this.
rpmlint outputs:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
obs-studio.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so*
obs-studio.src:54: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs
obs-studio.src:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so
obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
4 years, 2 months
Re: Rawhide
by Sérgio Basto
On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 14:52 +0500, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-
developers wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Still no Rawhide in RPM Fusion Koji?
Mass branch should be done soon, in one or two weeks , ATM rawhide from
RPMFusion , use F30 branch as base repos ( as usual ) . And it will be
announced on this mailing list .
Mass rebuilds of somane bumps are in progress (manner of speech), x265
and x264 are done and ready for F30 ...
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
4 years, 2 months
Expedite Latest Discord Build
by Sean Callaway
Good evening,
Due to the nature of the Discord application, when they update versions,
they prevent previous versions from connecting. So, those using the
RPMFustion version of Discord are unable to login until they get the latest
version. If the build in testing can be pushed to stable, that'd be greatly
appreciated.
Thanks,
Sean Callaway
4 years, 2 months
Re: [ffmpeg] Mass rebuild for x264
by Sérgio Basto
FTBFS only in x86_64 because doesn't find x264-devel !
As "last resource" I tried :
koji-rpmfusion tag-build f30-free-override x264-0.157-1.20190303git72db437.fc30
but didn't work
On Tue, 2019-03-12 at 04:31 +0100, Sérgio M. Basto wrote:
> commit 5b6887b2058895f63613820993645e8ace2de24e
> Author: Sérgio M. Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>
> Date: Tue Mar 12 01:59:27 2019 +0000
>
> Mass rebuild for x264
>
> ffmpeg.spec | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> ---
> diff --git a/ffmpeg.spec b/ffmpeg.spec
> index a116401..f27f0fa 100644
> --- a/ffmpeg.spec
> +++ b/ffmpeg.spec
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ ExclusiveArch: armv7hnl
> Summary: Digital VCR and streaming server
> Name: ffmpeg%{?flavor}
> Version: 4.1.1
> -Release: 3%{?date}%{?date:git}%{?rel}%{?dist}
> +Release: 4%{?date}%{?date:git}%{?rel}%{?dist}
> License: %{ffmpeg_license}
> URL: http://ffmpeg.org/
> %if 0%{?date}
> @@ -420,6 +420,9 @@ install -pm755 tools/qt-faststart
> %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
>
>
> %changelog
> +* Tue Mar 12 2019 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> - 4.1.1-4
> +- Mass rebuild for x264
> +
> * Mon Mar 04 2019 RPM Fusion Release Engineering <
> leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> - 4.1.1-3
> - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpmfusion-commits mailing list --
> rpmfusion-commits(a)lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> rpmfusion-commits-leave(a)lists.rpmfusion.org
--
Sérgio M. B.
4 years, 2 months
RPM Fusion update report 2019-03-13
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
obs-studio-23.0.2-1.fc28
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
k3b-extras-freeworld-18.12.2-1.fc29
obs-studio-23.0.2-1.fc29
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
discord-0.0.9-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
clipgrab-3.8.2-1.fc28
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
discord-0.0.9-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
clipgrab-3.8.2-1.fc29
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
4 years, 2 months
pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-nonfree - review swap?
by Gombos Gergely
Hi,
I have submitted this package
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5155> for review into
RPMFusion.
It may not be the easiest one to review since most of the specfile is from
the Fedora Pulseaudio specfile, but it enables aptX, LDAC and AAC codecs
for Bluetooth headsets, any many people are happily using it already.
So there may be still some modifications needed but I'm willing to do them.
I'm OK to swap reviews (in Fedora repo, too) and would appreciate if
somebody could take it. :)
Best regards,
Greg
4 years, 2 months
