Improves the quick-docs/howto infra task
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi there,
There is an recent discussion to improve the documentation using
generated docs from git
(same as fedora quick-docs or others).
I would like to open this infra task to anyone with the possibility to
hand-over a test vm with admin access to setup the whole process.
The idea is to use the vm to setup the wiki from github remote (or
something else so we can have access easily to post-commit or else).
Ideally I'd like to have
From my side, I'd like to have theses features:
- Using a staging instance/url to have preview (which search engine
indexing disabled in robots.txt).
- RPM Fusion CSS/Skin
- Generation with post-commit or cron (either way)
I have a preference with the Fedora setup of quick-docs (using ansible
already exists).
This wiki should be able to be translated into others languages.
(default to en_US or whatever the browser).
A nice to have feature would be to fetch the existing content in our
wiki to have a mean for automatic conversion.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
3 years, 9 months
RPM Fusion update report 2019-08-26
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.fc29
xvst-3.0-7.20180822git3ae2797.fc29
Pushed to stable:
mpd-0.21.14-1.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc29
Fedora 30
-------------
Pushed to testing:
deepin-movie-3.2.24.3-1.fc30
deepin-music-5.0.1-2.fc30
mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.fc30
xvst-3.0-7.20180822git3ae2797.fc30
Pushed to stable:
mpd-0.21.14-1.fc30
telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc30
Fedora 31
-------------
Pushed to testing:
deepin-movie-3.2.24.3-1.fc31
deepin-music-5.0.1-2.fc31
mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.fc31
rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-31-2.fc31
xvst-3.0-7.20180822git3ae2797.fc31
Pushed to stable:
mpd-0.21.14-1.fc31
rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-31-1.fc31
telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc31
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mock-rpmfusion-free-31.0-1.el7
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
megasync-4.2.3-1.fc29
nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc29
Fedora 30
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.fc30
Pushed to stable:
megasync-4.2.3-1.fc30
nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc30
Fedora 31
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.fc31
Pushed to stable:
megasync-4.2.3-1.fc31
nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc31
rpmfusion-nonfree-obsolete-packages-31-1.fc31
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mock-rpmfusion-nonfree-31.0-1.el7
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
3 years, 9 months
Re: What are trusted repositories ?
by Nicolas Chauvet
Le ven. 23 août 2019 à 20:05, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers
<rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org> a écrit :
>
> On 23.08.2019 16:52, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > Can we trust proprietary repo ?
>
> Absolutely not.
Fedora already references google-chrome proprietary repository. And
rpmfusion-nonfree is made by nonfree software (some open, some others
are closed like nvidia).
I also note that RussianFedora redistributes several proprietary
applications, some with explicit permission from the holder, some
others without.
So I dont' see any argument behind that we can't trust proprietary repository.
At least if a repository is well know and won't replace any of our
packages, there is no reason for end-users not to use it.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
3 years, 9 months
What are trusted repositories ?
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi there,
In some review, some has mentioned the notion of "trused repositories".
Can we have clarification on this notion and what we expect for this ?
Can we trust proprietary repo ?
What can be audited (even when closed source software).
What level of trust can we expect or not ?
At least previously we had a page listing some repositories that would
be compatible:
https://rpmfusion.org/FedoraThirdPartyRepos (linked from the fp.o page).
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
3 years, 9 months
RPM Fusion update report 2019-08-23
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mpd-0.21.14-1.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc29
Pushed to stable:
get_iplayer-3.22-1.fc29
vlc-3.0.8-1.fc29
Fedora 30
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mpd-0.21.14-1.fc30
telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc30
Pushed to stable:
fs-uae-3.0.0-1.fc30
fs-uae-arcade-3.0.0-1.fc30
fs-uae-launcher-3.0.0-1.fc30
get_iplayer-3.22-1.fc30
shotcut-19.08.16-1.fc30
vlc-3.0.8-1.fc30
Fedora 31
-------------
Pushed to testing:
mpd-0.21.14-1.fc31
rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-31-1.fc31
telegram-desktop-1.8.2-2.fc31
Pushed to stable:
ffmpeg-4.2-3.fc31
fs-uae-3.0.0-1.fc31
fs-uae-arcade-3.0.0-1.fc31
fs-uae-launcher-3.0.0-1.fc31
get_iplayer-3.22-1.fc31
mplayer-1.4-3.fc31
mpv-0.29.1-10.20190814.gitcd7bcb9.fc31
shotcut-19.08.16-1.fc31
vlc-3.0.8-2.fc31
xine-lib-1.2.9-17.20190525hg14404.fc31
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
vlc-3.0.8-1.el7
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
megasync-4.2.3-1.fc29
nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
lpf-flash-plugin-32.0.0.238-1.fc29
Fedora 30
-------------
Pushed to testing:
megasync-4.2.3-1.fc30
nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc30
Pushed to stable:
lpf-flash-plugin-32.0.0.238-1.fc30
Fedora 31
-------------
Pushed to testing:
megasync-4.2.3-1.fc31
nautilus-dropbox-2019.02.14-1.fc31
rpmfusion-nonfree-obsolete-packages-31-1.fc31
Pushed to stable:
lpf-flash-plugin-32.0.0.238-1.fc31
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 8
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
3 years, 9 months
RPM Fusion is branched for f31
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi there,
.. or actually this is still a work in progress because the fedora
development/31 repos aren't published so far. and there is no rawhide
release rpm yet on our side.
But at least, the f31 branches are there, so please remind to push
(and build) for f31 also.
master now point to f32.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
3 years, 9 months
Re: [telegram-desktop/f29] Removed KDE subpackage.
by Nicolas Chauvet
Le jeu. 22 août 2019 à 13:50, Vitaly Zaitsev <xvitaly(a)rpmfusion.org> a écrit :
>
> commit 7baa7668ed2a35d94fa4556dd580c1a3fe2867bf
> Author: Vitaly Zaitsev <vitaly(a)easycoding.org>
Hello,
Please implements an obsoletes for this kde sub-package.
Thx in advances.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
3 years, 9 months
