May 2020 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 5640] New: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-base - GStreamer streaming media framework base plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5640 Bug ID: 5640 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-base - GStreamer streaming media framework base plug-ins Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-plugins-base/gstream... SRPM URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-plugins-base/gstream... Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters which operate on media data. Applications using this library can do anything from real-time sound processing to playing videos, and just about anything else media-related. Its plugin-based architecture means that new data types or processing capabilities can be added simply by installing new plug-ins. This package contains a set of base plug-ins. FAS login: rathann Why not in Fedora? Legacy unmaintained branch still required by a handful of proprietary applications. To be placed in separate RPM Fusion repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 months, 2 weeks

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 5641] New: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5641 Bug ID: 5641 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free - GStreamer streaming media framework "bad" plug-ins Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free/gst... https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-plugins-bad-free/gst... GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of elements which operate on media data. This package contains plug-ins that aren't tested well enough, or the code is not of good enough quality. FAS login: rathann Why not in Fedora? Legacy unmaintained branch still required by a handful of proprietary applications. To be placed in separate RPM Fusion repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 months, 2 weeks

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 5539] New: Please add qt-heif-image-plugin package to the rpmfusion-free repo

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5539 Bug ID: 5539 Summary: Please add qt-heif-image-plugin package to the rpmfusion-free repo Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zawertun(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Created attachment 2143 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=2143&action=edit qt-heif-image-plugin.spec This package allows to see previews of HEIF-images for example in Dolphin and see HEIF-images in the gwenview. Package depends on libheif, it can be found in rpmfusion-free. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 months, 2 weeks

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 5642] New: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer FFmpeg-based plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5642 Bug ID: 5642 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer FFmpeg-based plug-ins Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm... SRPM URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm... Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters which operate on media data. Applications using this library can do anything from real-time sound processing to playing videos, and just about anything else media-related. Its plugin-based architecture means that new data types or processing capabilities can be added simply by installing new plugins. This package provides FFmpeg-based GStreamer plug-ins. FAS login: rathann Why not in Fedora? Legacy unmaintained branch still required by a handful of proprietary applications. To be placed in separate RPM Fusion repository. Also, it depends on FFmpeg, which is in RPM Fusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 months, 2 weeks

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 5535] New: Review Requset: python-netapp-lib - NetApp library for Python

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5535 Bug ID: 5535 Summary: Review Requset: python-netapp-lib - NetApp library for Python Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dagofthedofg(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/survient/python-netapp-lib/master/pytho... SRPM URL: https://github.com/survient/python-netapp-lib/raw/master/python-netapp-li... Description: Library to allow Ansible deployments to interact with NetApp storage systems This package cannot be included in Fedora due to an incompatible license $ rpmlint python3-netapp-lib-2019.12.20-1.fc31.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint python-netapp-lib-2019.12.20-1.fc31.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first RPMFusion package however I am currently a package maintainer for several packages on Fedora and have a Fedora Package Sponsor. I do not have an RPM Fusion Package Sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 5643] New: Review Request: gstreamer-vaapi - GStreamer plugins to use VA API video acceleration

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5643 Bug ID: 5643 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-vaapi - GStreamer plugins to use VA API video acceleration Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SPEC URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-vaapi/gstreamer-vaap... SRPM URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-vaapi/gstreamer-vaap... Description: A collection of GStreamer plugins to let you make use of VA API video acceleration from GStreamer applications. Includes elements for video decoding, display, encoding and post-processing using VA API (subject to hardware limitations). FAS login: rathann Why not in Fedora? Legacy unmaintained branch still required by a handful of proprietary applications. To be placed in separate RPM Fusion repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 3863] New: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863 Bug #: 3863 Summary: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Various games are divided into two logical parts: engine and data. . game-data-packager is a tool which builds .rpm files for game data which cannot be distributed (such as commercial game data). Almost all ScummVM, Doom, Quake games are supported + others. http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/game-data/ ------------- http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/tool... The RPM support has been added _after_ the last release, so I temporary use dummy snapshot tarballs until next release. These are built this way: git archive --prefix=game-data-packager/ --format tar.gz master > ../rpmbuild/SOURCES/game-data-packager.tar.gz Which makes rmplint complain: "game-data-packager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: game-data-packager.tar.gz" ------------- This tool originated in Debian "contrib", because it's free software, but of no use without non-free assets; likewise it doesn't belong in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279177 : "game-data-packager's sole purpose is to repackage non-free game resources into distro packages. As such it has no place in Fedora itself." --------------------------- remaining rpmlint: game-data-packager.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors well, maybe GDP should use data from filewatcher to enhance it's mirror lists. either at build-time (bad, need internet acces), from time to time, or at run time. We have SHA1 hashes for files, so the source doesn't much matter. http://www.filewatcher.com/m/linuxq3apoint-1.32b-3.x86.run.30923961-0.html game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/game-data-packager that's not a script intended to be run, but a script fragement to be sourced game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/games/__init__.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/version.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/paths.py these are generated during the build, a shebang could be added too ----- This is my first RPM Fusion package. ------- upstream Makefile lacks a "make install" rule; having this would allow to trim the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

1 year, 1 month

1
29
0 / 0

Re: [x264/f30: 7/7] Merge branch 'f29' into f30

by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

On Friday, 04 October 2019 at 10:23, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Please consider to use cherry-pick next time. > I don't see the point to compute a merge resolution for the changelog > because of a single fix. > This is craziness. Cherry-picking only makes sense when the branches are too diverged. I did cherry-pick from f29 to el7 for that reason. The others are more or less the same. All the fixes that went into all branches should have been applied to the oldest applicable branch first and then merged upwards. This wasn't done, hence the current merge commits look uglier than they could be. They will be much cleaner in the future if this workflow is followed. Christopher over at fedora devel list has some valid points in favour of this way[1]: Git has excellent branch merging features. Merging branches, rather than cherry-picking across them, results in commits representing the same changeset being present in multiple branches, making it easier to search git history and identify which branches contain a specific change. Regards, Dominik [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o... -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan

1 year, 2 months

5
11
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2020-05-29

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc30 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.2.2-1.fc31 mythtv-31.0-3.20200527gitfc90482281.fc31 retroarch-freeworld-1.8.8-1.fc31 xpra-codecs-freeworld-4.0.1-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc31 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.fc31 stella-6.1.2-1.fc31 telegram-desktop-2.1.7-1.fc31 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.2.2-1.fc32 mythtv-31.0-3.20200527gitfc90482281.fc32 retroarch-freeworld-1.8.8-1.fc32 xpra-codecs-freeworld-4.0.1-1.fc32 Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.fc32 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.fc32 stella-6.1.2-1.fc32 telegram-desktop-2.1.7-1.fc32 vdr-markad-2.1.0-1.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: ffmpeg-3.4.7-2.el7 libopenshot-0.2.5-2.el7 libopenshot-audio-0.2.0-1.el7 openshot-2.5.1-1.el7 rfpkg-1.26.3-2.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: rfpkg-1.26.3-2.el8 Pushed to stable: plex-media-player-2.58.0-1.el8 Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc31 Fedora 32 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.fc32 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.el7 EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: steam-1.0.0.62-3.el8 Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

1 year, 4 months

1
0
0 / 0

Use git to apply binary patch?

by Richard Shaw

So I ran into my first binary patch trying to update MythTV. Plain "patch" doesn't seem to support this. The only thing I can think of is to use git to apply the patch manually in %prep instead of relying on %autosetup? Thanks, Richard

1 year, 4 months

3
3
0 / 0

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers May 2020