On 08.11.2008 05:01, David Timms wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 07.11.2008 15:03, David Timms wrote:
>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> No idea. Note, I try to test the stuff right now as well, but for some
> stupid reason the installation in a KVM guest fails with the last
> package (the kernel) anaconda tries to install
I think I saw someone say that devel/preview rpm and kernel were/are
getting installed twice, so that could be your issue ?
Or were you trying with F9/8 ?
F-9 host, Preview in KVM.
>>> But note, the better question would have been: Does out
comps.xml
>>> have the right format? But I think it has, as it works just fine with
>>> stand-alone pirut (if one complies and runs the F8 version on rawhide)
>> So I should continue to try and work out where the issue actually lies ?
> I'd be glad, yeah. But note, I'll try to run some test myself as well; I
> plan to open a bug in
bugzilla.redhat.com when I had a chance to look
> deeper into this.
>
> But note, we can't be really sure our comps files is correct. But I hope
> it is.
I don't see any test scripts etc for comps.xml {other than xml tests}.
OK, for 9:
http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/9/i386/repodata/804f17...
[...]
That seems to indicate that the group would include the "(RPM Fusion
Free)" text, and be different to the Fedora group, which contradicts
what you said earlier about the group being undifferentiated from Fedora.
That was a workaround that was used in F-8 and F-9 -- but the plan was
to get rid of that workaround for rawhide and get the real soltuion in
place, hence the comps.xml for rawhide looks quite different.
CU
knurd