[Bug 1313] Review Request : lightspark - An alternative Flash Player implementation

(In reply to comment #23) > (In reply to comment #22) > > > This is irrelevant here, you use flashblock or whatever the equivalent is on > > other browsers. > > To give some context, I'm coming from a University setting with 1000+ Fedora > workstations and over 3000 users. > > Gnash is out of the question for us (stability and support costs) but we are > finding lightspark promising. Flashblock etc. isn't really an option for us > either as it asks things of the users. > > Easy enough for us to patch out the gnash requirement and put it in a local > repo though. > > Just giving a different perspective. > Gnash is necessary for complete youtube support since lightspark doesn't support avm1 swfs. We can remove gnash from the requirements, but then you will have to install it manually to have full youtube support.