Re: MOC's packages review requests

2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com&gt; > On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > > No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one. > > The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly > ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no > longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new > one. > > Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original > submitter is still interested. > > The review seems stalled to me. > > About libRCC/libRCD ? > > You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit. > > Regards, > > Andrea. > Ah, ok. The last comment <https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c13>of Raymond Lu is of May 2010. At the comment 17 <https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c17>Yuri Timofeev says about a push of MOC to Fedora upstream (MOC cannot be include on Fedora repositories because of its requested and rejected packages) . Actually is someone still interested to it ?