http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67
--- Comment #23 from Orcan Ogetbil <orcanbahri(a)yahoo.com> 2008-11-04 07:40:05 ---
The reason given being that dos2unix does not work on FC3, which
looks entirely
obsolete to me. FC3 support was dropped ages ago!
No, the best reasoning against using dos2unix would be the favour of saving an
extra BuildRequires (BR) since sed doesn't need to be BR'd.
The sed line you'd use for this task is not more complex than the dos2unix
line. The more BR's you use the more pressure is put on the server on each
build. Hence packagers usually prefer sed for this kind of a task.
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.