Re: libdvdcss merger

Richi Plana wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 22:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >> I've looked at merging the libdvdcss packages. This is not necessary as both >> are identical, except that livna still includes a static lib in the -devel >> package which should be removed. > > Why remove the static libs (.a)? Are they going to go to a separate > package? And is this an rpmfusion policy? No they will be removed because static libs are no good, and this is not a rpmfusion policy but a Fedora one, and where applicapable we follow Fedora policies.