Re: renaming sdlmame to mame

W dniu 18.01.2010 13:38, supercyper pisze: > I agree with Andrea that > the best way to do this is to make a new review request for mame. > SDLmame can be safely Provides/Obsoletes by mame. > > See http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1593895, p7zip was > Provides/Obsoletes by xz-lzma-compat. > > 在2010-01-17 17:45:24，"Julian Sikorski" <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; 写道： >>W dniu 17.01.2010 10:36, Andrea Musuruane pisze: >>> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> as of 0.136u1, sdlmame has been merged with the official version - i.e. >>>> the SDL osd is now part of the MAME source. Thus, I'd like to request a >>>> package rename. What's the correct procedure to do that? Is opening a >>>> bug blocking the CVS admin one enough? >>> >>> I think the best way to do this is to make a new review request for >>> Mame that will obsolete sdlmame. >>> >>> Bye, >>> >>> Andrea. >>> >>OK, the package overhaul could definitely use a review. As a related >>question: is any of you using the intermediate sdlmame releases from >>testing? These are going to be more painful to produce, it seems, so I'm >>wondering if it's worth the effort. >> >>Julian >> > > > 0.137 is out, I'll upload the new package for review in the next couple of days. Julian