Re: Massrebuild status
Thorsten Leemhuis pisze:
On 26.04.2009 14:13, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 12.04.2009 14:43, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>> On 31.03.2009 08:01, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> The massrebuild finished here is a list of packages that failed:
>> A lot of rebuild problems have been fixed,
> And some more have have been fixed over the past few days :-)
>> but there are still some to go.
> Still the case.
>> Here is a list of packages that sill haven't been rebuild:
> [...]
We are now down to 5 packages that have not been rebuild:
503 lxtnow(a)gmail.com raine (no
response)
505 triad(a)df.lth.se sidplay (no
response)
510 lxtnow(a)gmail.com subtitle (no
response)
514 lxtnow(a)gmail.com streamdv (no
response)
519 felix(a)fetzig.org vdr-mp3
(response: upstream contacted)
We sooner or later need to decide what to do with those...
Cu
knurd
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FTBFS says:
Packages with unresolved FTBFS bugs immediately following the Alpha
release will be removed from the distribution. Package owners may
request that their package _not_ be removed provided they are actively
working on resolving the FTBFS and have a plan to resolve the FTBFS
before the Release Candidate release.
I'd say we should follow the policy and drop these packages for now,
they can be re-added at later date.
Julian