2010/2/23 David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au>
On 24/02/10 07:27, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
>
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1030
>
> --- Comment #100 from Alex Lancaster<alexl(a)users.sourceforge.net>
> 2010-02-23 21:27:38 ---
> (In reply to comment #99)
>
>> Ok, I'm willing to review this, but so far the only packages I've
>> reviewed for
>> Fedora have been softballs and this looks like it will be pretty massive.
>>
>
> Excellent! I'm sure others will also step in to help out. Also there's
> been
> a fair amount of "reviewing" already especially by Ralf (see the previous
> almost 100 comments!) so the package has already been through the ringer
> already and some of the trickier issues have already been addressed.
>
> Is -12 current?
>>
>
> Yep: -12 is the most recent.
>
Hi, I would like to suggest that this package review (which has really been
more of a packaging development bug) be closed, and a new one requested.
(close duplicate after create new bug)
This would keep the normal review stuff together, and uncluttered by the
preliminary package development work.
Anyone else agree/disagree ?
Cheers,
David Timms.
I don't see any problem with keeping the same bug report for the review,
That development side was fully part of the review process.
I don't see any reason to split, specially as this review seems exemplary of
what work need to be achieved if a package doesn't comply with our
guidelines.
Once that said, I guess a sum-up of what remain to be worked on, would be
welcome for a new comer.
Nicolas (kwizart)