Re: MOC's packages review requests
2012/10/6 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com>
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:36 AM, Antonio Trande
<anto.trande(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> No problem. I can complete the Bug789 or open another one.
The rule is FIFO. So the original request have the precedence. Kindly
ask the submitter in #789 if he is still interested. If he is no
longer interested, we can close that request and you can open a new
one.
Since you are not sponsored yet you cannot review #789 if the original
submitter is still interested.
The review seems stalled to me.
> About libRCC/libRCD ?
You must open a review request for each new package you want to submit.
Regards,
Andrea.
Ah, ok. The last comment
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c13>of Raymond Lu is of
May 2010.
At the comment 17
<https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789#c17>Yuri Timofeev
says about a push of MOC to Fedora upstream (MOC cannot be
include on Fedora repositories because of its requested and rejected
packages) .
Actually is someone still interested to it ?
--
*Antonio Trande
"Fedora Ambassador"*
*"Fedora italian translation group"*
*"Blogger"
**mail*: mailto:sagitter@fedoraproject.org <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
*Homepage*: http://www.fedora-os.org
*Sip Address* : sip:sagitter AT ekiga.net
*Jabber <http://jabber.org/>* :sagitter AT jabber.org
*GPG Key: 19E6DF27*
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 3.0 KB)