[Bug 680] Review Request: alsa-plugins-freeworld - The ALSA Plugins - freeworld version
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680
--- Comment #5 from Eric Moret <eric.moret(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-25 01:21:51 ---
the maemo plateform target an arm processor. This plugin is only
usefull to
control the dsp on such plateform. There is no dependency expect from dbus.
[snip]
There is a maemo sub-package that can be found for some distro on
ix86 and
x86_64. But I expect it will be usefull only for development purpose. (And I'm
not even sure).
Why would we want a package specific to the maemo platform knowing that the
distro itself does not officialy support the platform? If you think I missed
it, could you point me to the Fedora maemo support page?
The current shape, only the a52 and lavcrate plugin are provided (in
other
word, only needs the libavcodec dependency since a52 from libavcodec extends
feature wise the previous a52dec implementation.)
I would like to keep the freeworld keyword, and stay monolithic unless other
dependencies are added...
I am not suggesting the freeworld keyword should go but rather that using
subpackages would be consistent with other alsa-plugins subpackages. Splitting
the package has the additional benefit of not bloating the streamlined setup of
an embedded device. I would prefer to see 2 packages, one containing the a52
plugin: alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and the other having the lavcrate:
alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate even if they both depend on libavcodec.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.