[Bug 2782] Review request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2782 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |4 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com&gt; 2013-05-16 15:51:31 CEST --- RPMFusion review abuse-0.8-3.fc20.src.rpm 2013-05-16 $ rpmlint abuse \ abuse-debuginfo-0.8-3.fc18.x86_64.rpm \ abuse-0.8-3.fc18.src.rpm abuse.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen abuse.x86_64: W: invalid-license redistributable abuse.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/abuse-0.8/COPYING.GPL abuse-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license redistributable abuse.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen abuse.src: W: invalid-license redistributable 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint errors/warnings are harmless and can be ignored + The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The license isn't suitable for Fedora, but is fine for rpmfusion nonfree + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The package contains the license files (COPYING, COPYING.GPL, COPYING.WTFPL) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: ec678b8dc8d00e0382d8c805c6438489 abuse-0.8.tar.gz ec678b8dc8d00e0382d8c805c6438489 Download/abuse-0.8.tar.gz + The package builds fine n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane + The spec file handles locales properly n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all the directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages should not contain libtool .la files + Proper .desktop file handling + Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Looks good! APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.