Re: libdvdcss merger
Richi Plana wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 22:00 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I've looked at merging the libdvdcss packages. This is not necessary as both
> are identical, except that livna still includes a static lib in the -devel
> package which should be removed.
Why remove the static libs (.a)? Are they going to go to a separate
package? And is this an rpmfusion policy?
No they will be removed because static libs are no good, and this is not a
rpmfusion policy but a Fedora one, and where applicapable we follow Fedora
policies.
Regards,
Hans