https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805
--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Andrea Musuruane from comment #14)
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
> - Include "BSD and Boost" licenses.
Please remember the license tag is not a list of licenses found in the
source archive but it refers to the licenses of the contents of the *binary
RPM*:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License:_field
Moreover there is no BSD license in cannonball: "find . -name \* -type f
-exec grep "in source and binary forms" {} \;" does not return anything!
BSD (unspecified)
-----------------
cannonball-0.3/docs/license.txt
??
$ licensecheck -r * |grep BSL
src/main/cannonboard/asyncserial.cpp: *No copyright* BSL (v1.0)
src/main/cannonboard/asyncserial.hpp: *No copyright* BSL (v1.0)
'asyncserial.cpp' is directly involved during build, this is a Mixed Source
Licensing Scenario:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source...
Therefore the resulting license of the binary RPM is the MAME license (i.e.
MAME + BOOST = MAME).
Where is this reported this uniformity?
However, there is no any reference to the 'MAME' license in the source archive;
or am i wrong?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.