Re: Late branching for F-20 because of FFmpeg deps needfix
On 08/29/2013 12:14 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
Yep but BTW what to do with xine-lib 1.2 ?
I've not tried to rebuild and thus neither to possibly fix xine-lib 1.2
if needed. I'll take a look.
Is it possible to bundle the libav.. .so into the fedora build and
add a
xine-lib-extras with ffmpeg enabled ?
I don't know and adding more tricks to
the already complex packaging of
xine-lib and xine-lib-extras-freeworld is not really appealing to me.
Or we don't care and move it into RPM Fusion ?
My option of choice is to fully move xine-lib 1.2 to RPM Fusion,
together with all depending packages. This will remove the overhead of
maintaining xine-lib in Fedora and xine-lib-extras-freeworld into RPM
Fusion. Maintainers of depending packages seem ok with moving to RPM
Fusion, with the only drawback that they'll need to learn another
maintenance process (I sent a mail asking about the "modernization" of
the RPM Fusion build infra to be more closely matched to Fedora's, but
did not get an answer [1]).
I have opened a review bug for xine-lib 1.2 [2].
What's not clear to me is if the depending packages that will be moved
from Fedora need a re-review or not. See [3].
I prefer to have xine-lib removed if there is no forseable solution.
It would be a shame to loose xine-lib. Let's make it not happen :-)
Thx for the patch! BTW (I can set you the ACL by this week-end if
you
make an ACL request into our bugzilla).
Ok, will do.
Regards,
Xavier
[1]
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2013-July/0152...
[2] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2857
[3]
https://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2013-July/0152...