> What's wrong with that provided the package has an active
maintainer?
>
> It may have tons of security issues and it isn't useful at all because it
can
> hardly display any current web page correctly
Seriously -- what's wrong with providing a lightweight web browser? It
starts
up blazingly fast and renders reasonably well. I'm sure I'm not the only
user
who finds that useful.
i can't believe what i'm reading. I shouldnt laugh, I like my old stuff
too, but its probably going to have to stay a custom for yourself, I cant
see this getting into any repo either.