Re: rpmfusion Fedora-23 plans ?

Hi, On 23-10-15 13:57, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Hello mates > > On Qui, 2015-10-22 at 22:27 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > >> 2015-10-12 8:30 GMT+02:00 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com&gt;: >> Hi All, >> >> I'm getting requests to update the gstreamer packages to 1.6.x >> for Fedora-23: >> >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3794 >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3795 >> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3796 >> >> But AFAIK we are not building any packages for F-23 yet. What >> are the >> plans here ? >> Sorry for the lake for answear, >> >> >> The development/23 repository layout will probably stay some time >> after fedora 23 GA, which means the repository won't be frozen. >> >> development/23 is basically f22 packaged resigned with the f23 key, >> updates-testing will be f23 specifics packages >> (x264/ffmpeg/gst/others) >> >> >> Once everything got more into shape, we merge them into releases/23 >> later, but at least, the plan is still to have usable state from >> end-user point of view at GA time.(1 week delay!) >> >> As we can see/deduce, kwizart open a window to update F23 with > x264/ffmpeg/gst/mplayer/others , which means a mass rebuild ! and I'd > like try do it in oneshot ... > > Following ImportantDependencyLists [1] I have submit x264-0.148 > yesterday for F23 . > > I think is important show to others mates what is going on so, I had > publish a copy of what was submit in github [2] (and is only a copy!) , > I don't know if Julian is available , but I'd like see some coordination > to update ffmpeg to latest (2.8.1) , update mplayer as Dominik suggest > and check if there is more packages to update that imply soname bump . > Having some definite plans what to do with ffmpeg for rpmfusion would be great. I plan to update the gstreamer10-* packages to 1.6.x for F-23 and gstreamer1-libav now is using ffmpeg rather then libav despite its name, so I hope that I can build it against the system ffmpeg.