http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1702
--- Comment #16 from Cédric OLIVIER <cedric.olivier(a)free.fr> 2011-05-01 13:17:06
---
Sorry for delay, as promised you can find my review :
[X] rpmlint - OK
[X] Name according Naming GuideLines - OK
[X] Spec file name - OK
[+] Package must meet Packaging Guidelines - OK
- [X] Naming - OK
- [X] Version, release - OK
- [X] Licensing - OK
- [X] No inclusion of pre-built binaries or libraries - OK
- [X] Spec Legibility - OK
- [X] Use rpmlint - OK
- [X] Filesystem Layout - OK
- [!] Changelogs - (2)
- [X] Requires - OK
- [X] BuildRequires - OK
- [X] Summary and description - OK
- [X] Encoding - OK
- [X] Documentation - OK
- [X] Compiler flags - OK
- [X] Debuginfo packages - OK
- [NA] Devel Packages
- [NA] Shared Libraries
- [NA] Packaging Static Libraries
- [X] Duplication of system libraries - OK
- [NA] Configuration files
- [X] Desktop files - OK
- [X] Macros - OK
- [X] Handling Locale Files - OK
- [X] Parallel make - OK
- [X] File and Directory Ownership - OK
- [!] All patches should have an upstream bug link or comment - (1)
- [NA] Man pages - There isn't any arguments to imagination
[X] Licensing Guidelines - OK
[X] License field - OK
[!] Source URL Guidelines - (3)
[X] successfully compile - OK
[X] Packages must NOT contain any .la - OK
[X] Packages containing GUI applications must include a desktop file - OK
[X] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8 - OK
[X] builds in mock - OK
(1) - Could you add comments on patch to explain why there are here and if you
have information about them by upstream :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#All_patches_should_hav...
(2) - typo error : ')' in last release changelog. And if it's possible, could
you add some blank lines between each release for readability ?
(3) - could you use name macro as detailed in
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Sourceforge.net
So there is only cosmetics changes ...
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.