http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680
--- Comment #8 from NicolasChauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> 2009-06-29 14:15:09 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> > [snip] I would prefer to see 2 packages, one containing the
a52
> > plugin: alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and the other having the lavcrate:
> > alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate even if they both depend on libavcodec.
> OK I will follow this method. Am I allowed to keep the alsa-plugins-freeworld
> as an empty package that will pick -a52 and -lavcrate ?
If you simply re-use the alsa-plugins subpackage structure you should end up
with a source package called alsa-plugins-freeworld and upon building, two
binary packages alsa-plugins-freeworld-a52 and alsa-plugins-freeworld-lavcrate.
Ok
I will implement that.
What about speex plugin addition from Fedora side ?
--
Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.