October 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 107] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta - NVIDIA's beta proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta - NVIDIA's beta proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: s.adam(a)diffingo.com, rpmfusion-package- review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 106 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/rawhide/SRPMS/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-beta-177... Summary: NVIDIA's beta proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

16 years, 4 months

1
8
0 / 0

Next steps to get RPM Fusion running (V2)

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi! > just thought I write down a rough list of things that I plan to do for > RPM Fusion over the next couple of weeks. I'm sending it here in the > hope that some people help me with some of those task; then we hopefully > get RPM Fusion running quite soon. Here is a updated version; most important things at the top of the list; not all of the points necessarily have to be done, but ideally they all get done; if I missed anything just tell me ;-) - get the mirror manager that adrianr put in place (see http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/00... listed as mirrors.rpmfusion.org in DNS; Needs * adrianr: IP address * thias: DNS update Afterwards update rpmfusion-release packages accordingly. - get the remaining packages from dribble and livna into the repo and eveything fixed up; latest status can be found here: http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-October/00... - start importing and building the packages from freshrpms; I can do that, but I want to get the ACK from thias first; especially as http://rpmfusion.org/InitialPackageMerge likely is not fully up to date Having a list of packages that are ready for importing would help things a lot - someone should run dep checks (e.g. for F8, F9 rawhide; once with only free and once with both free and nonfree enabled); I suspect that some problems will be found that way - check that the upgrade path from Livna -> RPM Fusion is sane for each package in each of the supported Fedora releases (I did a rough check on F9; looks good, but there are some packages still missing; maybe we can ignore those for now, as some of them are broken in livna, so it's not much of a difference) - get the dep checker script from Fedora Extras/EPEL in place and let it automatically run after each successful push; if possible without to much work get upgradecheck running as well (Xavier is working on it afaik) - make sure all the kernel-modules from freshrpms are converted to kmods; also make sure all the update path for frehsrpms dkms users to akmods work - prepare a announcement mail - put rpmfusion-release packages into livna-testing repos for F-8 and F-9 to move all the testing users over - move packages from testing -> stable for F-8 and F-9; build new rpmfusion-release packages that have the testing repo disabled! - put rpmfusion-release packages into livna repos for F-8 and F-9 to move all the users over - announce - vacation = not that important = - in parallel to all the above: work further on getting the crucial packages into the EL repo for RPM Fusion ( http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-September/... ). Libmp4v2 (needed by faad2) is still blocking that work right now; https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466951 - test if current comps.xml stuff works on rawhide-anaconda; if yes then convert comps.xml from nonfree as well; details: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg02105... https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-September/msg02600... - are the nvidia bits sane? There were some mails about the 177series, but seems some questions were not answered yet = End = That's round about it from the top of my head. Did I miss anything? Likely, but I think I'm optimistic that I got the most important things on the list :-) Help for all the remaining tasks much appreciated. The mroe help, the quicker we can start RPM Fusion for real. Cu knurd

16 years, 4 months

12
42
0 / 0

cvsextras request

by Michel Salim

Hi, I've been a Fedora package maintainer for quite some time (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/), and currently maintain Vagalume for Livna/RPMfusion (I do not have commit rights for Livna, since Vagalume was reviewed just a couple of months ago, close to the transition to RPMfusion). I've set up my RPMfusion account, already have a Bugzilla account, signed the CLA and requested membership in packagers and bugs. Could one of the administrators approve my group membership? (note that the owners list does not list the email I use for Bugzilla, michel.sylvan(a)gmail.com, as I was using my fedoraproject.org email for the changelog entries. The package was initially intended for inclusion in Fedora, but while it does not contain any infringing code, it is useless without an MP3 plugin for Gstreamer and so would not have worked out of the box) Thanks, -- Michel Salim http://hircus.jaiku.com/

16 years, 5 months

2
1
0 / 0

for users...

by Valent Turkovic

Hi, I see that rpmfusion is working already on Fedora but the "Configuration page for users" is still empty: http://rpmfusion.org/Configuration Why? Thank you for your hard work! My Fedora box automatically switched to rpmfusion without a glitch and it is working perfectly! Thank you! Valent. -- http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless registered as user #367004 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org. ICQ: 2125241, Skype: valent.turkovic

16 years, 5 months

10
27
0 / 0

kino pulseaudio packaging dependency

by Christopher Stone

I needed to remove pulseaudio after upgrading to rawhide the other day, and in doing so I noticed that kino has a requirement on pulseaudio. Should kino Requires be pulseaudio-libs instead?

16 years, 5 months

2
3
0 / 0

Re: First steps of the transition from Livna to RPM Fusion begins now for livna-devel users!

by Richard Körber

Hi! > * having libdvdcvs in one of our repos could lead to projects or > cooperation's not to mention or link to us. That's not limited to Fedora > or Red Hat; also some journalists and howto-writers will also chose to > *not* mention RPM Fusion and thus not link to us, as it might be to > dangerous in some countries I can just endorse that... For me as an author of a German Fedora blog, I am always having mixed emotions about Livna. On the one hand, it's undoubtedly an important repository for Fedora. On the other hand, I am not allowed to mention it because this could indirectly be illegal advertising for a copy protection remover, which can be punished with up to one year of prison in Germany. I know that other German Fedora authors are thinking the same about that. Livna is "that certain repository" with sweet content, but also with a bad smell. I also offer a web service where changes in yum repositories are constantly tracked. I always wished to add Livna, but I didn't because of the same legal considerations. I see it that way: You have put a lot of effort on RPMfusion. You already offer a lot of packages that are important and also legal for non-commercial distribution. RPMfusion will be, without any doubt, the most important 3rd party repository for Fedora. It would be sad to waste all this great work because of just a single package. It would be stupid to give away all that free advertising in wikis and blogs and magazines, just to keep that single package. After all, libdvdcss is just a "rpm -ivh http://someotherserver" command away, for those people who really want to have it. Just my 2cc... Best regards -- Richard "Shred" Körber

16 years, 5 months

10
12
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-10-31

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: 2 compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.2-2.fc9 vlc-0.9.5-3.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: 1 k9copy-2.1.0-2.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 8: 1 compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.2-2.fc8 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/8: 2 k9copy-1.2.4-1.fc8 vlc-0.8.7-0.7.fc8 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 k9copy-2.1.0-2.fc10 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 9: compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.2-2.fc9 ----------------------------------- * Thu Oct 16 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 2.7.2-2 - update to 2.7.2 vlc-0.9.5-3.fc9 --------------- * Tue Oct 28 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.5-3 - Rebuild for dependency * Mon Oct 27 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.5-2 - Fix ppc/ppc64 build * Sat Oct 25 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.5-1 - Update to 0.9.5 - Use non-default rpmbuild options for dirac kate lua - Split core/nox (nox bundles directfb/svgalib) - Fix Selinux denials (patches from gentoo). - Fix spurious perms on qt4 sources. * Thu Oct 09 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.4-1 - Update to 0.9.4 * Tue Sep 30 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.3-2 - Add libv4l2 patch from Hans de Goede * Sat Sep 27 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.9.3-1 - Update to 0.9.3 (final) - Few others move from core to main ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/9: k9copy-2.1.0-2.fc9 ------------------ * Thu Oct 30 2008 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)fedoraproject.org> 2.1.0-2 - ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 (still fails) * Thu Oct 30 2008 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)fedoraproject.org> 2.1.0-1 - k9copy-2.1.0 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 8: compat-python24-libxml2-2.7.2-2.fc8 ----------------------------------- * Thu Oct 16 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info - 2.7.2-2 - update to 2.7.2 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/8: k9copy-1.2.4-1.fc8 ------------------ * Thu Oct 30 2008 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)fedoraproject.org> 1.2.4-1 - k9copy-1.2.4 vlc-0.8.7-0.7.fc8 ----------------- * Thu Oct 30 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.8.7-0.7 - Bump * Wed Oct 29 2008 kwizart < kwizart at gmail.com > - 0.8.7-0.5 - More security fixes - Few others move from core to main ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: k9copy-2.1.0-2.fc10 ------------------- * Thu Oct 30 2008 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)fedoraproject.org> 2.1.0-2 - ExcludeArch: ppc ppc64 (still fails) * Thu Oct 30 2008 Rex Dieter <rdieter(a)fedoraproject.org> 2.1.0-1 - k9copy-2.1.0

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

Move packages from testing to stable repos for F8 and F9

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi! We are afaics getting closer to have RPM Fusion ready for the official lunch, so if it's fine for everyone I'd say we move the all packages from the rpmfusion updates-testing repos to the rpmfusion updates repos for F8 and F9; at the same time put new rpmfusion-release packages into the repo that have rpmfusion updates-testing disabled. A few days later we then should start to use rpmfusion updates-testing properly -- e.g. build and ship kmods and other packages in rpmfusion updates-testing to match the packages from fedoras updates-testing repos. Does that sound fine for everybody? Cu knurd

16 years, 5 months

8
20
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2008-10-30

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 smplayer-0.6.4-1.fc10 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: smplayer-0.6.4-1.fc10 --------------------- * Wed Oct 29 2008 Sebastian Vahl <fedora(a)deadbabylon.de> - 0.6.4-1 - new upstream version: 0.6.4

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-10-30

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: 1 qmc2-0.2-0.7.b5.fc9.1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 9: qmc2-0.2-0.7.b5.fc9.1 --------------------- * Wed Oct 29 2008 Julian Sikorski <belegdol[at]gmail[dot]com> - 0.2-0.7.b5.fc9.1 - Rebuilt, as something seems to have eaten a part of i386 rpm

16 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers October 2008