October 2009 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 52] New: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52 Summary: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: i386 OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dominik(a)greysector.net Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/acerhk-kmod.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/acerhk-kmod-0.5.35-2.2.6.25.6_55.f... Description: Radio Kill Hotkey driver for Linux. Supports various models of the following laptops: Acer Travelmate, Acer Aspire, Acer Extensa, Fujitsu Siemens Amilo (Pro), Medion MD, Prestigio Nobile and others. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 2 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 53] New: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver - common files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53 Summary: Review Request: acerhk-kmod - Acer Hotkey driver - common files Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: i386 OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dominik(a)greysector.net Blocks: 52 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/acerhk.spec SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/acerhk-0.5.35-2.fc9.src.rpm Description: Common files for Radio Kill Hotkey driver for Linux. Supports various models of the following laptops: Acer Travelmate, Acer Aspire, Acer Extensa, Fujitsu Siemens Amilo (Pro), Medion MD, Prestigio Nobile and others. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 879] New: Review request:staging-kmod -- Selected kernel modules from linux-staging

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=879 Summary: Review request:staging-kmod -- Selected kernel modules from linux-staging Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedora(a)leemhuis.info CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,878 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedora/staging-kmod.spec http://www.leemhuis.info/files/fedora/staging-kmod-2.6.30.8-1.fc11.1.src.rpm * kmod package, hence can't go to Fedora * rpmlint has warnings, but those are afaics unavoidable for kmod packages -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 902] New: Review Request: nvidia-settings - NVIDIA driver control panel

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902 Summary: Review Request: nvidia-settings - NVIDIA driver control panel Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/nvidia/nvidia-settings-1.0-3.2.fc1... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/nvidia/nvidia-settings.spec Summarry: NVIDIA driver control panel The purpose of this split is to avoid version changes on current, newest and beta series of the nvidia drivers along with building the configuration tool from source to avoid well known problem when built from older distro. The version is hidden delibeately because there is no needs for version/drivers to exactly match. This is meant to be in nonfree despite the tools itself is Free as in license. As opposite to libvdpau, this tools isn't designed to be used beyond the nvidia proprietary driver. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 901] New: Review Request: nvidia-xconfig - NVIDIA X configuration file editor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901 Summary: Review Request: nvidia-xconfig - NVIDIA X configuration file editor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/nvidia/nvidia-xconfig-1.0-1.fc12.s... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/nvidia/nvidia-xconfig.spec Summary: NVIDIA X configuration file editor The purpose of this split is to avoid version changes on current, newest and beta series of the nvidia drivers along with building the configuration tool from source to avoid well known problem when built from older distro. The version is hidden delibeately because there is no needs for version/drivers to exactly match. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
7
0 / 0

hugin and software patents

by Michel Alexandre Salim

Hugin is the featured article of the week at LWN, and Fedora is specifically mentioned, in that our package is crippled (thanks a bunch, software patent laws!). http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/351053/4c479d238c69ae76/ Would there be interest in packaging a full version for RPMfusion, and if so, would it be in -free or -nonfree? If the Fedora packager is not an RPMfusion contributor yet, I believe the process is almost automatic? I'd be willing to review the package if it's submitted. Regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim

14 years, 5 months

3
4
0 / 0

bsnes 0.051+

by Julian Sikorski

Hi, as of 0.051, bsnes is now GPL. This is not the only change, however. It also now requires an additional library [1] to support compressed ROM images. The problem is that this library seems (at the first glance) contain mostly duplicated code from rar, 7-zip and friends, albeit modified. I have no skills nor time to try patching it up to use system-wide libs, so I have no idea how to proceed. For now, I have requested the latest bsnes build not to be pushed to stable, but it is of course only temporary. I have attached a preliminary spec file, which gets the job done. The thing is whether we are willing to accept such a chunk of (at least partially) duplicated code to save the ability of bsnes to use compressed ROM images. Cheers, Julian [1] http://byuu.org/bsnes/, the snesreader library

14 years, 5 months

2
7
0 / 0

How to move on with infrastructure?

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi! Some of you might be aware of it, other not, but we afaics have a (whole) lot of medium-sized and small problems in the infrastructure area(¹). The main ones from the top of my head: - our infrastructure team basically consists of just one person: Xavier Lamien (laxathom/SmootherFrOgZ) - multiple people offered to help in the past (²), but not even one of those people found its way into the project/the infrastructure team: Why? It can't continue like that, as that is a route to fail... - it sometimes take a lot of time until cvs requests are done - we have a x86-64 builder that isn't used since a few weeks (months?) - we afaik were asked to migrate to a different ppc builder but that work stalled - using koji and bodhi for RPM Fusion is something that people are asking for every few weeks - there are multiple small problems (often not in bugzilla) that are annoying, but not pressing (no automatic rebuilds, no repoclosure scripts, repodata regeneration after push, incomplete delta-rpm support are some of them, out-of-diskspace situations, some builders use mock caching while others do not, rawhide out of date on of of the builders, ...) So how to we fix all of the above to make sure RPM Fusion gets more healthy over time? Cu knurd (¹) With "infrastructure area" I mean the system we utilize (buildsys and stuff), the services running there and the people that take care of them; rel-eng is a different issue (there are also lot's of problems that need to be fixed, but that's IMHO a topic for another mail once we solved the infra are) (²) for example http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2009-September/... http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2009-September/... but there were a lot more offers

14 years, 5 months

9
12
0 / 0

lisas.de builder temporarily disabled

by Adrian Reber

Due to the ubuntu release I have to shut down my builder VM temporarily as my mirror server is always under heavy load during the release of a distribution. I will enable it again in a few days. Adrian

14 years, 5 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 751] New: Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751 Summary: Review request: vboxgtk - A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hicham.haouari(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/vboxgtk.spec SRPM URL: http://hicham.fedorapeople.org/vboxgtk-0.5.0-1.fc11.src.rpm Description: A simple GTK frontend for VirtualBox. Most of VirtualBox features are not supported, and those that are will probably fail. This package is not eligible in Fedora because it depends on VirtualBox-OSE which is in rpmfusion. rpmlint output for spec and srpm : none rpmlint for binary rpm: vboxgtk.i586: E: devel-dependency VirtualBox-OSE-devel vboxgtk.i586: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. -vboxgtk uses VirtualBox python API, and thus requires VirtualBox-OSE-devel -the package is python based so there is no binary This is my first rpmfusion package -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 5 months

1
20
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers October 2009