April 2011 - rpmfusion-developers

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hello, IIRC, firewing1 has dropped support for avidemux some time ago, requesting for a new maintainer. This package currently need an rebuild in {not_yet}Branched/F15 because of x264 which will probably request an update also If someone interested please raise a hand. Thx Nicolas (kwizart)

13 years

5
7
0 / 0

New package question

by Richard Shaw

I may be getting my terminology mixed up but now that I'm officially a package maintainer, does that make me an a "RPMFusion Sponsored Packager"? If so, do I skip some parts of the package review process? (i.e. blocking bug 30?) I've got another package put together, imagination, which is a simple slide show creator that I'd like to get added to RPMFusion. I've got it building cleanly in mock and rpmlint on all the packages and on the installed package are clean. I think I'm good with the guidelines but could certainly use some help making sure. One question related to the spec file. The guidelines are a little unclear when you have to do ldconfig. This package does create .so libraries, but they are installed into their own directory, not directly into /usr/lib{,64} and as far as I know they are not available for other applications to link against. Thanks, Richard

13 years

2
1
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2011-04-14

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/14: 3 ffmpeg-0.6.2-1.fc14 NEW openshot-1.3.0-3.fc14 : A GTK based non-linear video editor vlc-1.1.9-1.fc14 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: 1 vlc-1.1.9-1.fc13 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 4 ffmpeg-0.6.90-0.2.rc0.fc15 mplayer-1.0-0.123.20110412svn.fc15 NEW openshot-1.3.0-3.fc15 : A GTK based non-linear video editor vlc-1.1.9-1.fc15 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/14: ffmpeg-0.6.2-1.fc14 ------------------- * Wed Apr 06 2011 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 0.6.2-1 - Update to 0.6.2 * Mon Jan 10 2011 Dominik Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> - 0.6.1-1.20110110svn - 20110110 snapshot - bump version to post-0.6.1 to allow stable 0.6.1 update in older branches - drop --with amr->opencore_amr indirection - add qt-faststart tool (bug #1259) openshot-1.3.0-3.fc14 --------------------- * Sun Apr 10 2011 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 1.3.0-2 - Fixed spec file for packaging guidelines compliance. vlc-1.1.9-1.fc14 ---------------- * Tue Apr 12 2011 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.1.9-1 - Update to 1.1.9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) testing/13: vlc-1.1.9-1.fc13 ---------------- * Tue Apr 12 2011 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.1.9-1 - Update to 1.1.9 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: ffmpeg-0.6.90-0.2.rc0.fc15 -------------------------- * Tue Apr 12 2011 Dominik Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> - 0.6.90-0.2.rc0 - fixed missing av_parser_parse symbol (upstream patch) mplayer-1.0-0.123.20110412svn.fc15 ---------------------------------- * Tue Apr 12 2011 Dominik Mierzejewski <rpm at greysector.net> - 1.0-0.123.20110412svn - 20110412 snapshot - drop obsolete libvorbis patch - add explanatory comments to all patches - temporarily disable mp3lib decoder (workaround for bug #1680) openshot-1.3.0-3.fc15 --------------------- * Sun Apr 10 2011 Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com> - 1.3.0-2 - Fixed spec file for packaging guidelines compliance. vlc-1.1.9-1.fc15 ---------------- * Tue Apr 12 2011 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.1.9-1 - Update to 1.1.9

13 years

1
0
0 / 0

akmod nvidia - failing to build

by Agnes Jones

Hi, I'm having trouble with the akmod build of the nvidia module, log: ===== 13 Apr 08:08:43 akmods: Building RPM using the command '/usr/bin/akmodsbuild --target x86_64 --kernels 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64 /usr/src/akmods/nvidia-kmod.latest' tail: cannot open `/tmp/akmodsbuild.OFge8ysC/.jobexit' for reading: No such file or directory /usr/bin/akmodsbuild: line 218: ((: != 0 : syntax error: operand expected (error token is "!= 0 ") mv: cannot stat `/tmp/akmodsbuild.OFge8ysC/RPMS/x86_64/*': No such file or directory 13 Apr 08:08:43 akmodsbuild: * Rebuilding /usr/src/akmods/nvidia-kmod.latest for kernel(s) 2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64: /usr/bin/akmodsbuild: line 185: /usr/bin/time: No such file or directory 13 Apr 08:08:43 akmodsbuild: 13 Apr 08:08:43 akmodsbuild: Failed to move /tmp/akmodsbuild.OFge8ysC/RPMS/x86_64/* to /tmp/akmods.5KJJZTjz/results 13 Apr 08:08:43 akmods: Building rpms failed; see /var/cache/akmods/nvidia/260.19.36-1-for-2.6.35.11-83.fc14.x86_64.failed.log for details ===== Is this because it doesn't have access to the /tmp folder ? Or maybe something disappears between creation and next read ?

13 years

2
2
0 / 0

[Bug 1257] New: Review request - gpac - MPEG-4 multimedia framework

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1257 Summary: Review request - gpac - MPEG-4 multimedia framework Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lucas.jacobs(a)mines.sdsmt.edu CC: kwizart(a)gmail.com, rpmfusion-package- review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 1.5 Created an attachment (id=427) --> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=427) Diff from old SRPM to new SRPM, without the new CVS tarball SRPM: http://vidya.dyndns.org/stuff/gpac-0.4.6-0.4cvs20100527.fc13.src.rpm SPEC: http://vidya.dyndns.org/stuff/gpac.spec Description: GPAC is a multimedia framework based on the MPEG-4 Systems standard developed from scratch in ANSI C. The original development goal is to provide a clean, small and flexible alternative to the MPEG-4 Systems reference software. GPAC features the integration of recent multimedia standards (SVG/SMIL, VRML, X3D, SWF, 3GPP(2) tools and more) into a single framework. GPAC also features MPEG-4 Systems encoders/multiplexers, publishing tools for content distribution for MP4 and 3GPP(2) files and many tools for scene descriptions (MPEG4 <-> VRML <-> X3D converters, SWF -> MPEG-4, etc). Short version: This package is already in RPM Fusion, (patent concerns?) and used to include MP4Box, a popular muxing tool. Currently the binary RPM doesn't include MP4Box, and the source RPM doesn't build. This submission will fix that. rpmlint mentions some harmless comments in the spec file that I didn't remove because they were present in the previous version, and missing manpages for some binaries - manpages for mp4box and mp4client are provided, however. There's also the source tarball pulled straight from gpac's CVS repository which needs to be hosted somewhere. I've been using MP4Box built from this SRPM for a while, and it seems to work fine. Osmo4 crashes on start, but that's nothing new. I haven't tried the rest yet. I just finished getting the SRPM to cross-compile for a 32-bit target on a 64-bit platform, so that should be okay. This is my first RPM Fusion package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years

1
3
0 / 0

New contributor introduction

by Richard Shaw

Hello everyone, I just wanted to introduce myself to the list. I'm not particularly verbose so I hope this will do. I look forward to contributing to other packages after I improve my packaging knowledge base. I guess one thing I can brag about is apparently I'm the first person to become a RPMFusion packager without having first become a Fedora packager! I'm working on a few packages for Fedora[1,2] but openshot just happened to get approved first. Thanks, Richard M. Shaw [1] openCOLLADA: 3D import and export library. Blender is the only linux user I know of but it's compiled in staticly by default so has been stripped out of the default Fedora build. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694287 [2] discspan: I'm co-maintiner of this project on sourceforge. It's a (relatively) simple python script to archive files in a directory structure to CD or DVD. It doesn't compress or tar them together so each file is individually accessible. Good for archiving picture and music libraries since the files are generally already compressed (jpeg, mp3, ogg, etc.). I'm still getting the package into shape for submission...

13 years

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 459] New: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 Summary: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki... SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki... Description: NVIDIA(R)CUDA(TM) is a general purpose parallel computing architecture that leverages the parallel compute engine in NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs) to solve many complex computational problems in a fraction of the time required on a CPU. It includes the CUDA Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) and the parallel compute engine in the GPU. To program to the CUDATM architecture, developers can, today, use C, one of the most widely used high-level programming languages, which can then be run at great performance on a CUDATM enabled processor. Other languages will be supported in the future, including FORTRAN and C++. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: Not open source. rpmlint output: >rpmlint ../SRPMS/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-2.1-1.src.rpm nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib This is ok, even moving file from the hardcoded path. nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src: W: no-%build-section Nothing to build. This, however, implies no stripping & no debuginfo. Unfortunately, debuginfo creation fails because the binaries don't contatin build id. I don't know whether there is something I could do with this. >rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-* nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/bec nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/inline nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/be nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gfec nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/nvopencc See the previous comment. nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcufft.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcufftemu.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcudart.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 Again, there is nothing we can do with this, AFAIK. This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora packager (both FAS names are mjakubicek). My primary motivation to package this is that I maintain a CUDA-enabled application, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487981. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years

1
30
0 / 0

Newbie question: needsign?

by Richard Shaw

Ok, I searched the old mailing list archives as best I could but didn't find a good answer. I assume that NEEDSIGN is a flag/queue of some sort where the package sits until it is signed with the repo key? What's the process from this point? Do I need to do anything else? Will my package go into -testing? Since it's the first release I don't know that would be beneficial... Thanks, Richard

13 years

2
6
0 / 0

[Bug 993] New: Review request: openshot - GNOME Non-linear video editor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993 Summary: Review request: openshot - GNOME Non-linear video editor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-12/openshot.spec SRC: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-12/openshot-0.9.54-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: OpenShot Video Editor is a free, open-source, non-linear video editor, based on Python, GTK, and MLT. It can edit video and audio files, composite and transition video files, and mix multiple layers of video and audio together and render the output in many different formats. Why is not on Fedora: It depend of MLT Framework Rpmlint output: openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/nl_NL/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/sv_SE/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. I tried to use %find_lang OpenShot macro but without effects. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
92
0 / 0

Offline for two weeks from 16/04 to 30/04

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi, As state in https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation I will be away from an internet keyboard from 16/04 to 30/04. Thx

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers April 2011