[Bug 3429] New: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
Bug #: 3429
Summary: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads
games
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads-1.2.3-1.fc22.sr...
Description: TADS stands for "Text Adventure Development System". It's a set of
tools that allow easy implementation of text adventures, or "Interactive
Fiction".
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial
license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3)
Rpmlint:
frobtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++)
frobtads.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman)
frobtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frob
frobtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tadsc
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary t3make
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint
unversioned-explicit-provides: this bundled pieces has no version (it is also
in other packages)
no-manual-page-for-binary: not strictly required by guidelines :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
Bug #: 3335
Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec
implementation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec.
It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple
API makes it easy to integrate it into other software.
The package was rejected for Fedora
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC
implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as
previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information.
Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated.
This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and
sponsor it.
rpmlint output for the RPMs:
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> "codec" is just fine for this.
libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0....
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
-> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the
package just fine with wget or curl.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
-> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's
fine.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec ->
codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
-> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet.
Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
-----
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3491] New: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
Bug #: 3491
Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from
mp3splt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
libmp3splt - a library created from mp3splt
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt.spec
libmp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on
libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec).
rpmlint output:
libmp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on
libmp3splt/libmp3splt-libs/liblibmp3splt
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a
Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager.
I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes
(http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3647] New: Review request: zboy - A GameBoy emulator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3647
Bug #: 3647
Summary: Review request: zboy - A GameBoy emulator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/zboy.spec
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/zboy-0.60-1.fc21.src...
Description:
zBoy is a multiplatform GameBoy emulator that provides a load/save feature,
can perform PCX screenshots either manually or automatically (every few
seconds) and emulates an internal battery for ROMs that were designed to use
one (this allows to use the internal save option provided by such games,
remember highest scores, etc).
zBoy supports some additional features, too, like intelligent saving of
hi-scores for some games that aren't able to save their hi-scores table by
themselves because of the lack of a battery-backed RAM on the cartridge, and
improving screen's resolution output using graphic algorithms like Scale2x,
Scale3x, eagle...
It is also one of the very few GameBoy emulators that provides a 2-gameboys
link emulation, which makes it possible to play some games in 2-players mode
on a LAN.
Why not in Fedora:
Emulators are not allowed in Fedora
Rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/zboy-0.60-1.fc21.src.rpm
zboy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiplatform -> multiform,
formulation, formulator
zboy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screenshots -> screen shots,
screen-shots, screens hots
zboy.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameboys -> game boys,
game-boys, homeboys
zboy.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://zboy.sourceforge.net/ [Errno 104]
Connection reset by peer
zboy.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/zboy/zboy-0.60.tar.gz timed out
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/zboy-0.60-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
zboy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multiplatform ->
multiform, formulation, formulator
zboy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screenshots -> screen
shots, screen-shots, screens hots
zboy.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameboys -> game boys,
game-boys, homeboys
zboy.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://zboy.sourceforge.net/ [Errno 104]
Connection reset by peer
zboy.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary zboy
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint
/home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/zboy-debuginfo-0.60-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
zboy-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://zboy.sourceforge.net/ [Errno
104] Connection reset by peer
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
AFAIK spelling is correct and URLs are correct too.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3693] New: Review request: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3693
Bug #: 3693
Summary: Review request: girl - GNOME Internet Radio Locator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/girl.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/girl-5.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: I am the developer of the GNOME Internet Radio Locator, and would
like to see it included in RPMFusion since some of the included radio stations
depends on the MP3 codec. Girl is a GNOME Internet Radio Locator program that
allows the user to easily find and record live radio programs on radio
broadcasters on the Internet. Girl is developed on the GNOME platform and it
requires at least one audio player such as Totem to be installed for playback
and streamripper for recording. Enjoy Internet Radio.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
this package belongs to rpmfusion, because it uses streamripper and
GStreamer-plugins (which are not in Fedora) to decode audio.
rpmlint girl-5.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
girl.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US streamripper -> stream
ripper, stream-ripper, stripper
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
rpmlint girl-5.0.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
girl.x86_64: E: invalid-appdata-file /usr/share/appdata/girl.appdata.xml
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint girl-debuginfo-5.0.0-1.fc22.x86_64.rpm
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-streams.h
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-streams.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-runners.h
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl.h
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-runners.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-listener.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-program.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-listener.h
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-program.h
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-tz.h
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-tz.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-stations-map.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-gui.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-stations-map.h
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-station.c
girl-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/src/debug/girl-5.0.0/src/girl-station.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 17 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3774] New: Review request: freshplayerplugin - PPAPI-host NPAPI-plugin adapter
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3774
Bug #: 3774
Summary: Review request: freshplayerplugin - PPAPI-host
NPAPI-plugin adapter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mauricio.teixeira(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC -
https://people.redhat.com/mteixeir/freshplayerplugin/freshplayerplugin.spec
SRPM -
https://people.redhat.com/mteixeir/freshplayerplugin/freshplayerplugin-0....
The main goal of this project is to get PPAPI (Pepper) Flash player working in
Firefox via a wrapper.
This package is not eligible for Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg for
building.
$ rpmlint *.rpm
freshplayerplugin.src: W: invalid-url Source0: freshplayerplugin-0.3.2.tar.gz
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency alsa-lib
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency glib2
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libconfig
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libevent
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libv4l
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libva
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvdpau
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency openssl-libs
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libfreshwrapper-pepperflash.so
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/libfreshwrapper-pepperflash.so
['/builddir/build/BUILD/freshplayerplugin-0.3.2/build/src']
freshplayerplugin.x86_64: W: no-documentation
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 11 errors, 3 warnings.
- ignoring explicit-lib-dependency because spec was inherited from someone else
who give up maintaining it
- ignoring unstripped-binary-or-object because docs say it should be done
automatically if perms are 0755, but it did not work
- ignoring no-documentation because source does not install any
This is my first RPM Fusion package.
I'm seeking for sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months