[Bug 3827] New: Review request: rfpkg - RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Bug #: 3827
Summary: Review request: rfpkg - RPMFusion utility for working
with dist-git
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: anto.trande(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Description:
RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git.
SPEC: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rfpkg/rfpkg.spec
SRPM:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rfpkg/rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc...
$ rpmlint rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint rfpkg-rpmfusion-free-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm
rfpkg-rpmfusion-nonfree-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm
rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm
rfpkg-rpmfusion-free.noarch: W: no-documentation
rfpkg-rpmfusion-nonfree.noarch: W: no-documentation
rfpkg.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/rfpkg/COPYING
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Notes:
I don't know if this package must be packaged in EPEL5 too; impossible for
missing packages (pyrpkg).
It can be built in Fedora and EPEL6.
I added same Requires package from fedpkg, since rfpkg is a fork project;
unsure if it's correct.
bash-completion file seems automatically installed in datadir in Fedora 23, in
/etc/bash_completion.d in Fedora 24 and EPEL.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3762] New: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3762
Bug #: 3762
Summary: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Group: Package Reviews
Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd.spec
SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd-0.0.0-3git20150901.fc22.src.rpm
Description:
This is a work-in-progress implementation of the vendor-neutral dispatch layer
for arbitrating OpenGL API calls between multiple vendors on a per-screen
basis, as described by Andy Ritger's OpenGL ABI proposal.
Currently, only the GLX window-system API and OpenGL are supported, but in the
future this library may support EGL and OpenGL ES as well.
Fedora Account System Username: kwizart
This package is currently only supported on x86_64 i386 and armhfp
This package has been submitted for fedora, specially as it might be used by
mesa at some point.
Until approved or if there is any other issue preventing, it will better makes
senses in the nonfree section instead of the free section. This package is
currenly usefull for the nvidia nonfree driver in optimus setup.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
Kodi 16 testing
by Michael Cronenworth
Hello,
Kodi 16 is nearing release and I would like to get out in front of it with some testing.
Here are the RPMs and SRPMs for Kodi 16 beta 3:
http://cchtml.com/kodi16/
A new library, dcadec, is now required and I will bring it into RPMFusion shortly.
Please let me know if any issues here or in bugzilla.
Thanks,
Michael
8 years, 10 months
[Bug 2433] New: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433
Bug #: 2433
Summary: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of
extra plugins for Qmmp
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.sr...
Description:
Plugins for Qmmp from Qmmp Plugin Pack that cannot be included in Fedora.
* MPG123 - MPEG v1/2 layer1/2/3 decoder using of libmpg123 library
I guess the reason why not in Fedora is obvious after reading the Description
... mp3 stuff. The rest of the plugins was submitted into Fedora here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740
rpmlint output:
[kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
[kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm
qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1/COPYING
The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or
misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file,
possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF.
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- I've asked Ilja via email to resolve the license issue upstream
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 10 months
port of game-data-packager to Fedora
by Alexandre Detiste
(reposting message first sent to games(a)lists.fedoraproject.org)
Hi,
My redhat/fedora skills were a bit rusty (1998-rusty),
so as an exercice I dediced to port to fedora
the game-data-packager Debian native project I'm working on.
So far, so good, it's already mostly done.
https://github.com/a-detiste/game-data-packager/commits/fedora
That will provide Fedora recipes to automaticaly build noarch .rpm
for currently about 200 games; one of my goal is to cover
all versions of all scummvm games.
It can also download shareware data for doom, quake, descent... games.
http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/game-data/
Of course it would be better to have real Fedora users that test this;
not only someone that run a minimal install on a container.
(chocolate-doom works over "ssh -X" !)
For example I already spotted that fedora "dynamite" package is lacking
id-shr-extract program needed to unpack wolf3d shareware;
but rpmfusion provides "wolf3d-shareware.noarch" sot this is not a problem.
Two interresting dependencies of G-D-P I didn't found in rpmfusion
are innoextract & lgogdownloader; when installed a setup....exe
sold by GOG.com can be automaticaly downloaded & repacked as a .rpm
Greets,
Alexandre Detiste
8 years, 10 months
Dealing with new approved packages for rpmfusion
by Hans de Goede
Hi all,
Looking at:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33
There are quite a few new packages which are waiting
to have CVS / git repos created for them and for them
to be imported / added to the repos.
I know that with the new infra this process is currently
on hold, but we are getting quite a big backlog of these,
and I'm afraid that not dealing with these in a timely
manner will scare of new contributors. So I wonder if
it would be possible to have a temporary process to
be able to process these while we're migrating to the
new infra ?
Thanks & Regards,
Hans
8 years, 10 months