October 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3465] New: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3465 Bug #: 3465 Summary: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... Description: Dropbox extension for nautilus file manager Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 1 month

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3658] New: Review request: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion nonfree repository

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658 Bug #: 3658 Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion nonfree repository Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-dat... SRPM: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-dat... Description: Appstream metadata for packages in the RPMFusion free repository Not eligible for Fedora since it's metadata from RPMFusion packages. [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk noarch]$ rpmlint ./rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.noarch.rpm ../../SRPMS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.src.rpm ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: no-documentation rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-nonfree-22-icons.tar.gz ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-nonfree-22-icons.tar.gz 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. Nothing substantial here either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 3657] New: Review request: rpmfusion-free-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion free repository

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Bug #: 3657 Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-free-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion free repository Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-2... Description: Appstream metadata for packages in the RPMFusion free repository Not eligible for Fedora since it's metadata from RPMFusion packages. RPMLINT OUTPUT: [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk noarch]$ rpmlint ./rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.noarch.rpm ../../SRPMS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.src.rpm ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: no-documentation rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-free-22-icons.tar.gz ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-free-22-icons.tar.gz 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. Nothing substantial here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 4155] New: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4155 Bug #: 4155 Summary: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: manisandro(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm Description: Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec Not in Fedora because: "ITU G729 usage is governed by a patent license to be acquired from Sipro Lab" Rpmlint: $ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source, Open-source, Outsource bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open source, open-source, outsource bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source, Open-source, Outsource bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open source, open-source, outsource bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti bcg729.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/bcg729/COPYING $ rpmlint bcg729-devel-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/encoder.h bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/decoder.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 51 errors, 7 warnings. The incorrect FSF address was reported upstream at [1]. Remaining issues are non-issues. [1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/linphone-developers/2016-07/index.html This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora sponsored packager (FAS: smani) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
27
0 / 0

About chromium packaging

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hello, I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist I haven't see any message from the developers mailing list where this has been discussed. To be, the only valid reason why a software can be banned from the repo is that it cannot be redistributed. -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 5 months

9
21
0 / 0

[Bug 3443] New: Review request: nemo-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nemo

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3443 Bug #: 3443 Summary: Review request: nemo-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nemo Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nemo-dropbox/1/nemo-dro... SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nemo-dropbox/1/nemo-dro... Description: Dropbox extension for nemo file manager Dropbox allows you to sync your files online and across your computers automatically Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 5 months

1
23
0 / 0

[Bug 3999] New: Review request: xt7-player-mpv - Qt/Gambas gui to mpv media player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3999 Bug #: 3999 Summary: Review request: xt7-player-mpv - Qt/Gambas gui to mpv media player Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/xt7-player-mpv.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/xt7-player-mpv-0.14.384-1.... Description: Aims to be an (in)complete graphical interface to mpv, focused on usability. It also provides extra features like youtube and shoutcast integration, dvbt, media tagging, library and playlist managment and a lot more. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora, because it depends on mpv. rpmlint -v xt7-player-mpv.spec ../SRPMS/xt7-player-mpv-0.14.384-1.fc24.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/xt7-player-mpv-0.14.384-1.fc24.noarch.rpm xt7-player-mpv.spec: I: checking xt7-player-mpv.spec: I: checking-url https://github.com/kokoko3k/xt7-player-mpv/archive/0.14.384.tar.gz#/xt7-p... (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.src: I: checking xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gui -> GUI, goo, gun xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US youtube -> you tube, you-tube, YouTube xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shoutcast -> sh outcast, sh-outcast, shout cast xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dvbt -> debt xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist -> play list, play-list, pluralist xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US managment -> management, engagement, Mantegna xt7-player-mpv.src: I: checking-url http://xt7-player.sourceforge.net/xt7forum/ (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/kokoko3k/xt7-player-mpv/archive/0.14.384.tar.gz#/xt7-p... (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.noarch: I: checking xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gui -> GUI, goo, gun xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US youtube -> you tube, you-tube, YouTube xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shoutcast -> sh outcast, sh-outcast, shout cast xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dvbt -> debt xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist -> play list, play-list, pluralist xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US managment -> management, engagement, Mantegna xt7-player-mpv.noarch: I: checking-url http://xt7-player.sourceforge.net/xt7forum/ (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xt7-player-mpv.gambas 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 5 months

1
10
0 / 0

Update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ?

by Sérgio Basto

Hi, Nicolas, ask me to bring this discussion to the mailing list . Nicolas sorry for the delay , I had a big cold, I'm ok now (it just an excuse :) ) OK, all story is in https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4260 and in https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4145 and we have 48 packages depends on ffmpeg-libs. First, ABI changes of ffmpeg 3.0.x to 3.1.x ? "There are no SONAME changes, only new symbols added to the libraries, so they're backwards compatible and no rebuild of dependencies should be required" . "mpv will break" . My arguments, I read today http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#All_other_updates and it have one exceptions list, we have some items that can be applied to this case, like : - The update doesn't change ABI/API and nothing needs to be rebuilt against the new version. (almost) - The update fixes serious bugs that many fedora users are encountering. ffmpeg-3.0 is a major version that had short duration, it was the first version of an major version (3.0.x), so we expect have more bugs, also vlc now requires ffmpeg 3.1.x and we have to maintain it about more 9 months (F24 be an fresh version also counts). Finally Nicolas wrote: "I'm sure we should have a decision better sooner than later about this (...) I'm reserving my last arguments for the mailing list". I hope have one decision, quickly and close this subject (update ffmpeg in F24 to 3.1.x ? ). Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 5 months

7
16
0 / 0

[Bug 30] New: Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Summary: Tracker : Sponsorship Request Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lxtnow(a)gmail.com CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is a tracker bug for sponsorship requests in RPM Fusion. All new RPM Fusion contributors who need to be sponsored should block this bug. SPONSORS: When you accept the responsibility of sponsoring, please take it off of this list. Note: All members who already contribute to the Fedora Project (Packaging Side) no need to request for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 5 months

1
87
0 / 0

Updating ffmpeg to 3.2 in rawhide

by Julian Sikorski

Hi list, ffmpeg-3.2 was released two days ago. As mentioned by Nicolas, this update is only in scope for F26 currently. The good news is that it is looking better than I ever remember ffmpeg rebase to be: - there are currently 48 ffmpeg dependencies in rpmfusion git - 46 build fine against 3.2 with no changes required - kodi requires an upstream patch [1] - gpac fails due to what looks to be an openssl issue (undefined reference to `SSLeay_add_all_algorithms'), likely caused by the openssl-1.0.2j → openssl-1.1.0b bump in Fedora. build.log attached. Given the above, I would be looking at updating ffmpeg and rebuilding its dependencies next weekend at the latest. Should anyone disagree, please speak up. Best regards, Julian [1] https://github.com/xbmc/xbmc/commit/2e2e7a5e7ff18dcf3ba3fae2d2ea6d0d9b42b7ea

7 years, 5 months

4
8
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers October 2016