October 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 351] New: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Summary: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. Can't be in Fedora: - it's a meta package - it enables use of non fedora software - the proper packaging should really be done by the upstream author. - the upstream is not open source - the upstream do not support the fedora distribution - FESCO discussed it recently, and voted that helper packages for third party apps shall be blocked from Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007#c17 The original Fedora review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 FESCO item tracking: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/35 FESCO discussion should show up soon for 2009-01-30: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/ ===== rpmlint: vmware-requirements.src:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security/pam_unix.so vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:57: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings. ===== So, do we want to allow helper packages like this in RPM Fusion ? Note it does not Require: any packages external to Fedora/RPM Fusion, nor does it attempt to download them. Others have mentioned that other external no source apps might include skype etc, that could receive similar RPM Fusion packaging assistance ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 5 months

1
9
0 / 0

yet anothers things to do: Appstream, comps and remix

by Sérgio Basto

Hello, Adam Williamson wrote today in reply of one question (made by me) : "Hmm, actually, maybe it currently doesn't, but it definitely has before: http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/testing/20/x86_64/co mps.xml But basically, any repo can have comps data and dnf will respect it; you can set up an external repo with comps data that lists some package from that repo as being in the `standard` group, for instance, and when it installs the `standard` group, dnf will include that package. AFAIK this has always been intended to work. I'm not sure how often it gets tested. " Goggled and found http://rpmfusion.org/comps , so maybe we should add rpmfusion-comps repo (to archive) , in https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-comps/ like fedora-comps , btw comps was talked here in rpmfusion in 2007 [1] , and if we need generate comps.xml , we also may talk in Appstream , we need generate something isn't it ? And since remxis depends on comps.xml (If I am correct), also talk about RPMFusion remixs, not propose generate the remixs , but at least update remix specs [2], and be able do remix in a local machine . About appstream [3], can I add/update the missing packages for Fedora 23 ? and close the review request after that? Cheers, [1] http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2007-October/ 000042.html [2] https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/?q=remix [3] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658 -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 6 months

3
3
0 / 0

[Bug 3429] Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429 František Dvořák <valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #9 from František Dvořák <valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz> --- Added -fpermissive C++ build flag yet - required by 32-bit platforms (ix86) and arm. The build has been successful (branches: master, f25, f24, f23). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

akmods RFE

by Richard Shaw

I have a request to disable plugs on kmod install (dnf --noplugins)... Anyone see any issues with that? Thanks, Richard

7 years, 6 months

2
2
0 / 0

review report

by Sérgio Basto

Hello, Here is a report what I found that remains more or less lost :), I'm writing down, for better organization . npapi-vlc http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=171 ufoai http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=417 being transfer to fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157255 e-uae, wait for some package be published in f24 ... http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=322 vdr-dxr3 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=251 last build Fedora 14 https://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=vdr-dxr3&submit=Sea rch+...&system=&arch= kmediafactory http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=101 acoustid-fingerprinter http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2 last build Fedora 21 https://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=acoustid-fingerprin ter&submit=Search+...&system=&arch= cmus http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=26 miro http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=147 mamory http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=140 kodi-pvr-addons (to be retired ?) http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=104 also today https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/?q=slmodem slmodem appears today on github.com/rpmfusion latest build Fedora 12 https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=slmodem-kmod-de buginfo slmodem should be orphaned, but the package wasn't properly converted from cvs, nothing to worry in the short term. I hope that can call this the last review report :) , all other packages seems that are rolling out !. Best regards and thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 6 months

2
3
0 / 0

Release blocker bug for f25

by Nicolas Chauvet

I've created a release blocker bug for f25. If you think something must be fixed on our side by f25, please create a separate ticket and block bug 4313 or use the f25 (as an alias to bug). Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 4256] New: Review request: aegisub - Tool for creating and modifying subtitles

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4256 Bug ID: 4256 Summary: Review request: aegisub - Tool for creating and modifying subtitles Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 URL: http://www.aegisub.org OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rebus(a)seznam.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 4255 Blocks: 2 SPEC: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/aegisub.spec SRPM: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/aegisub-3.2.2-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Aegisub is a free, cross-platform open source tool for creating and modifying subtitles. Aegisub makes it quick and easy to time subtitles to audio, and features many powerful tools for styling them, including a built-in real-time video preview. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: Package depends on ffms2 library, which depends on the ffmpeg. $ rpmlint aegisub.spec ../SRPMS/aegisub-3.2.2-1.fc23.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/aegisub-3.2.2-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm aegisub.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary aegisub-3.2 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. This is not my first package and I am also Fedora packager. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 6 months

1
13
0 / 0

build perl problem on mythtv

by Sérgio Basto

Hi, in F25 I can't install mythtv-status because Requires: perl(MythTV) and perl-MythTV-0.28-5.fc25.noarch.rpm no longer provides perl(MythTV) the rebuild of mythtv-0.28-5.fc25 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1999 all build logs have 6 times : sh: /usr/bin/perl: No such file or directory and other 6 times perl: warning: Setting locale failed. perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings: LANGUAGE = (unset), LC_ALL = (unset), LANG = "en_US.UTF-8" are supported and installed on your system. perl: warning: Falling back to the standard locale ("C"). I try understand what is happened but failed , maybe glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject .org/message/J6DQABIQJ66YVATAETWWIBY7WZGVV5T4/ or Build Root Without Perl https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Build_Root_Without_Perl#Upgrade. 2Fcompatibility_impact any tip ? Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 6 months

6
29
0 / 0

[Bug 2444] Review request: mp3fs - A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 --- Comment #26 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)gmail.com> --- Just a comment, the summary is lame imo "A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system" where is the 3? "A dynamic MP3 encoding fuse file-system" TBH I prefer the debian summary "FUSE filesystem for transcoding FLAC to MP3 on the fly" https://packages.debian.org/jessie/utils/mp3fs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 2444] Review request: mp3fs - A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 --- Comment #25 from Stuart Gathman <stuart(a)gathman.org> --- Waiting for Internal Error on fas.rpmfusion.org to get fixed so I can create an account. In the mean time, updated SPEC: SPEC: https://gathman.org/linux/SPECS/mp3fs.spec SRPM: https://gathman.org/linux/f23/src/mp3fs-0.91-3.fc23.src.rpm $ rpmlint mp3fs-0* 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers October 2016