[Bug 2444] Review request: mp3fs - A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444
Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sergio(a)serjux.com
--- Comment #17 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> ---
(In reply to Stuart Gathman from comment #11)
> I submitted this package quite some time ago. Did I miss something? Was
> there a next step I was supposed to take? I don't believe I have priv to
> build on the official build system. If it is just a matter of waiting for
> people to get a round TUIT, I understand. I just want to make sure I'm not
> missing something in the procedure. I presume it would help if I submitted
> some packages to Fedora first?
Please submit it again and preferably updated last release is 0.91 [1] , here I
just see package review for 0.32 .
Thanks.
[1] https://github.com/khenriks/mp3fs/releases
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 1 month
[ANNOUNCE] pkgdb is live at rpmfusion.org !
by Nicolas Chauvet
It's now possible to login into our pkgdb instance at
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/
It will use our ipsilon instance at id.rpmfusion.org, that is
connected to a freshly migrated fas instance.
That was a lot of work to understand what needs fixing and how to
adapt, so please enjoy.
About ipsilon:
It implements only the openid connect protocol (no saml2 yet). you
should be able to use a login
https://id.rpmfusion.org/openid/id/{username}
(tested with ask libreoffice.org).
About pkgdb:
What is known not to work are:
- Create package request
- Create branch request.
That needs more knowledge about which verification are done and what
need to be adapted in the pkgdb code.
Packager ACL requests should work, provenpackager is implemented and
sergio and leight are admins.
Please report others issues here of in bugzilla. But my priority is to
have new branches and packages working.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
8 years, 1 month
[Bug 4293] New: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293
Bug ID: 4293
Summary: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments
Z80-based graphing calculators
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/tilem/tilem.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/tilem/tilem-2.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
TilEm is an emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based
graphing calculators. It can emulate any of the following calculator
models:
TI-73 / TI-73 Explorer
TI-76.fr
TI-81
TI-82
TI-82 STATS / TI-82 STATS.fr
TI-83
TI-83 Plus / TI-83 Plus Silver Edition / TI-83 Plus.fr
TI-84 Plus / TI-84 Plus Silver Edition / TI-84 pocket.fr
TI-85
TI-86
TilEm fully supports all known versions of the above calculators (as
of 2012), and attempts to reproduce the behavior of the original
calculator hardware as faithfully as possible.
In addition, TilEm can emulate the TI-Nspire's virtual TI-84 Plus
mode. This is currently experimental, and some programs may not work
correctly.
RPM Fusion FAS Username: tc01
Why not in Fedora: While tilem is GPLv3, and while purely FOSS firmware exists
for the TI-84+, a ROM dump of a calculator is required in order to emulate it,
and the image of a calculator's ROM (containing e.g. TI's proprietary boot
code) is not legal to redistribute. Thus even though the new Fedora emulator
policy is less restrictive, I believe tilem is still not allowed in Fedora.
rpmlint output: there's no man page for tilem, so this is okay.
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/tilem-2.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/tilem-2.0-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm
tilem.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tilem2
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 1 month