[Bug 3601] New: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Bug #: 3601
Summary: Review request: spread - High performance messaging
service
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
- spec file:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/master/spread.spec
- src rpm:
https://github.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/raw/master/spread-4.2.0-1.fc21.src...
- descriptoion (common to main package and all subpackages):
Spread is an open source toolkit that can be used in many distributed
applications that require high reliability, high performance, and robust
communication among various subsets of members. The toolkit is designed
to encapsulate the challenging aspects of asynchronous networks and
enable the construction of reliable and scalable distributed applications.
- why not in Fedora:
Spread Open-Source License is not considered a Good License, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081#c9
- is this my first rpmfusion package
no, I've already filed another package:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600
- am I seeking a sponsor:
no, I am Fedora sponsored packager
- rpmlint on src rpm:
spread.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
> this is exactly what http://www.spread.org/ reads
spread.src: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> this is why Fedora don't accept the package
spread.src: W: invalid-url Source0: spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz
> source tarball cannot be downloaded directly, only through a web form
- rpmlint on rpms:
spread.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> -devel only contains unversioned .so, which is a symlink to versioned .so in -libs
spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/SP_multicast.3.gz 28: warning: macro `TB' not defined
> no idea, suggestions welcome
spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/FL_multicast.3.gz 50: warning: macro `TB' not defined
> no idea, suggestions welcome
spread-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libspread.so.3.0.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
> let's believe the upstream they know what they're doing
spread-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread-static.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 2421] New: booh - Static web-album generator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2421
Bug #: 2421
Summary: booh - Static web-album generator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: casper.le.fantom(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh.spec
SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh-0.9.3-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
Yet another Web-Album generator. Highlights:
* automatic rotation of portrait images thanks to information
put by digital camera in .jpg file (EXIF)
* immediate display of images (preloading in browser)
* keep position of "next/previous" hyperlinks in browser
between images
* full video support (including thumbnailing)
* clever use of the whole space of a typical browser window
(the need to scroll portrait images is stupid)
* themability
* sub-albums support
* remember your preferred size of thumbnails accross sub-albums
* multi-processor support to speed up thumbnails generation
* smooth integration of panoramic images in thumbnails pages
* multi-languages web-album navigation (navigation links are
automatically shown in user's language)
* a GUI to input captions, rotate, reorder and remove
images FAST (extensive use of keyboard shortcuts)
* another GUI to classify photos and videos in a powerful manner
Hello, this a new package for rpmfusion-free repository
Have a nice day
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 2677] New: Review request: al-anvar - A cross-platform Quran Study Software
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2677
Bug #: 2677
Summary: Review request: al-anvar - A cross-platform Quran
Study Software
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: nanopqr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Address of spec file: http://dpnano.com/rpm/al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
address of source rpm file: http://dpnano.com/rpm/al-anvar.spec
About al-anvar:
Al-Anvar is a cross-platform Quran Study Software. It uses "Tanzil.net" and
"Zekr.org" database as its database, It has lots of features:
- Text of the Quran
- Adding different translations of the Quran
- Adding interpretation of the Quran
- ...
I didn't try to put this package in fedora, but one of guys said that religious
software couldn't be in fedora.
Output of rpmlint:
$rpmlint al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.i686.rpm
al-anvar.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sura -> aura, supra,
sure
al-anvar.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/al-anvar-0.5.0/README
al-anvar.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary al-anvar
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$rpmlint al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.src.rpm
al-anvar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sura -> aura, supra, sure
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
"sura" is the name of each part of Quran, I don't know why it isn't in spell
checker.
This is my first rpm in rpmfusion.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 2483] New: Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts for the web
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483
Bug #: 2483
Summary: Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts
for the web
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: janes.rob(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
spec file:
https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/mscorefonts2/specs/msttcore-fon...
Source rpm:
no source rpm. there is no source, the microsoft eula doesn't allow
distribution of the fonts with the rpm.
rpm:
https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/mscorefonts2/rpms/msttcore-font...
========================================================================
Description:
This provides the TrueType core fonts for the web that were once
available from http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/ prior
to 2002, and most recently updated in the European Union Expansion
Update circa May 2007, still available on the Microsoft website.
With this rpm the actual font cab files are downloaded from a
Sourceforge project mirror and unpacked at install time. Therefore
this package technically does not 'redistribute' the fonts. The
fonts are then added to the core X fonts system as well as the Xft
font system.
These are the cab files downloaded:
andale32.exe, arialb32.exe, comic32.exe, courie32.exe,
georgi32.exe, impact32.exe, webdin32.exe, EUupdate.EXE,
wd97vwr32.exe
These cab files are only downloaded if EUupdate.EXE cannot be
downloaded, since the EUupdate.EXE cab contains updates for
the fonts in these cabs:
arial32.exe, times32.exe, trebuc32.exe, verdan32.exe
These are the fonts added:
1998 Andale Mono
2006 Arial: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
1998 Arial: black
1998 Comic: bold, regular
2000 Courier: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
1998 Impact
2006 Times: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
2006 Trebuchet: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
2006 Verdana: bold, bold italic, italic, regular
1998 Webdings
========================================================================
Fedora eligibility:
I haven't tried, but I assume licensing restrictions on the fonts would be an
issue, although the fonts are not a part of the rpm.
========================================================================
rpmlint:
========================================================================
This is my first rpmfusion package
========================================================================
I am seeking a sponsor.
[ I think that's what I'm supposed to do ]
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 2717] New: Review Request: pianobar - Command-line Pandora Internet radio client
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2717
Bug #: 2717
Summary: Review Request: pianobar - Command-line Pandora
Internet radio client
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: greg.hellings(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec File: http://dl.thehellings.com/pianobar/pianobar.spec
SRPM File:
http://dl.thehellings.com/pianobar/pianobar-2012.12.01-2.fc18.src.rpm
Description: Pianobar is a command-line Pandora client which allows you to play
and manage your Internet radio options
Ineligible for Fedora: While not hard dependencies, faad2 is required for
playing nearly all Pandora audio and libmad is required for some Pandora One
(premium, paid account) material.
$ rpmlint pianobar-2012.12.01-2.fc18.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint x86_64/pianobar-{,debuginfo-}2012.12.01-2*
pianobar-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
The debuginfo-without-sources seems to appear whenever binary and debug RPMs
are generated separately from one another.
This is not my first package proposal for RPMFusion but the previous ended up
being a duplicate, so - if approved - this will be my first RPMFusion package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 2384] New: Review request: vlcj - Java framework for the vlc media player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2384
Bug #: 2384
Summary: Review request: vlcj - Java framework for the vlc
media player
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mefoster(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Created attachment 914
--> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=914
build.log from local mock build
Spec file: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/vlcj.spec
SRPM: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm
Description:
The vlcj project is an Open Source project that provides Java bindings for
the excellent vlc media player from VideoLAN. The bindings can be used to
build media player client and server software using Java - everything from
simply playing local media files to a full-blown video-on-demand streaming
server is possible.
Not eligible for Fedora because: it depends on vlc, which is in rpmfusion
rather than Fedora
% rpmlint vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm noarch/vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
noarch/vlcj-javadoc-2.1.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
vlcj.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vlc -> vac, VLF
vlcj.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlc -> vac, VLF
vlcj.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vlc -> vac, VLF
vlcj.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlc -> vac, VLF
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
==> Ignored because vlc is the correct name of the package
This is my first rpmfusion package, but I maintain several packages (mainly
Java packages) in Fedora and am active in the Fedora Java SIG.
Note that this package requires a patch to be applied to the "jna" library in
Fedora as described here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833786
I will attach a mock build.log from building this package in mock on my local
machine against a patched version of jna.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 3833] New: Review request: pianobar - "pianobar" is a free/open-source, console-based Pandora client
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3833
Bug #: 3833
Summary: Review request: pianobar - "pianobar" is a
free/open-source, console-based Pandora client
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: stephendherr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
* Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package.
Spec:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kczgg3fm1ajfjob/pianobar.spec?dl=0
SRPM:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/kn4l1s0yz5ouui1/pianobar-2014.09.28-1.fc23.src....
* A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec
file).
Pianobar is a free/open-source, console-based client for the personalized
online radio Pandora
* play and manage (create, add more music, delete, rename, ...) stations
* rate songs and explain why they have been selected
* upcoming songs/song history
* customize keybindings and text output
* remote control and eventcmd interface (send tracks to last.fm, for example)
* proxy support for listeners outside the USA
* Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora.
It depends on ffmpeg-libs which is not available in Fedora.
* The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it.
$ rpmlint SRPMS/pianobar-2014.09.28-1.fc23.src.rpm
pianobar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eventcmd -> eventide
pianobar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fm -> FM, Fm, gm
pianobar.src: W: invalid-license AS-IS
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
The spelling error warnings are not correct.
The license warning is just complaining that it doesn't recognize "as-is" as a
license type, but if you actually read COPYING you'll see it's about as simple
and permissive as could possibly be.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/pianobar-2014.09.28-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
pianobar.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency ffmpeg-libs
pianobar.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libao
pianobar.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgcrypt
pianobar.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eventcmd -> eventide
pianobar.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fm -> FM, Fm, gm
pianobar.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2014.09.28
['2014.09.28-1.fc23', '2014.09.28-1']
pianobar.x86_64: W: invalid-license AS-IS
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 4 warnings.
Same as above, with the addition of:
The three explicit-lib errors are wrong, those are the names of the rpms in
question, not libraries.
The version is what the upstream project uses as a version.
This is my first RPM Fusion package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 3090] New: Review request: cmplayer - a Qt-based multimedia player utilizing the MPV video back-end.
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3090
Bug #: 3090
Summary: Review request: cmplayer - a Qt-based multimedia
player utilizing the MPV video back-end.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: thebenj88(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2, 30
Package contains the CMPlayer multimedia player, a GUI for mpv.
rpmlint -i cmplayer-0.8.6-1.fc20.src.rpm
cmplayer.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/xylosper/cmplayer/releases/download/v0.8.6/cmplayer-0....
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
^^ I'm not sure what's causing this problem, as this URL works both with a web
browser and wget.
rpmlint -i cmplayer-0.8.6-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
cmplayer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cmplayer
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
^^ Unsure what to do about this.
You'll notice that the spec file refers to 'libchardet-devel' in the
BuildRequires, as I've also packaged libchardet. However, the upstream
developer has included scripts to download and build libchardet statically if
needed. I'm unsure if libchardet should be packaged as well, so I guess this is
up to the reviewer.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months