January 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3805] New: Review request: cannonball - An Enhanced OutRun Engine

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 Bug #: 3805 Summary: Review request: cannonball - An Enhanced OutRun Engine Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/cannonball.spec https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/cannonball-0.3-1.fc2... Description: Cannonball is a program which allows you to play an enhanced version of Yu Suzuki's seminal arcade racer, OutRun, on a variety of systems: - 60 fps gameplay (smoother than the original game) - True widescreen mode (extend the play area by 25%) - High Resolution mode (improves sprite scaling) - Time Trial Mode - Cheats - Customisable Music - High Score Saving - Western, Japanese & prototype track support - Analog & Digital controllers supported - Force Feedback / Haptic support (Windows only) - Fixes bugs present in the original game Why not in Fedora: Emulators are not allowed in Fedora Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/cannonball-0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm cannonball.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate cannonball.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widescreen -> wide screen, wide-screen, windscreen cannonball.src: W: invalid-license Custom 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/cannonball-0.3-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm cannonball.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate cannonball.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widescreen -> wide screen, wide-screen, windscreen cannonball.x86_64: W: invalid-license Custom cannonball.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cannonball 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/cannonball-debuginfo-0.3-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm cannonball-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Custom 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. AFAIK spelling is correct and the license is fine too since we are in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 3600] New: ubuntu-fonts - The font family used in Ubuntu Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 Bug #: 3600 Summary: ubuntu-fonts - The font family used in Ubuntu Linux Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org - spec file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/ubuntu-fonts-rpm/master/ubuntu... - src rpm: https://github.com/holcapek/ubuntu-fonts-rpm/raw/master/ubuntu-fonts-0.80... - description: The Ubuntu Font Family are a set of matching new libre/open fonts. The development is being funded by Canonical on behalf the wider Free Software community and the Ubuntu project. The technical font design work and implementation is being undertaken by Dalton Maag. - why not in Fedora: Ubuntu Font License is considered non-free: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642#c4 - rpmlint on src rpm: ubuntu-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libre -> lire, lib re, lib-re > %description is exactly what can be found at http://font.ubuntu.com/about/ ubuntu-fonts.src: W: invalid-license Ubuntu Font License > the reason I'd like to see the package in rpmfusion ubuntu-fonts.src: W: no-%build-section > there's nothing to build, thus no %build secion - rpmlint on binary rpm: ubuntu-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libre -> lire, lib re, lib-re ubuntu-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license Ubuntu Font License - this is my first rpmfusion package - I am already a Fedora package maintainer: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/holcapek/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 4393] New: Review Request: zoneminder - A camera monitoring and analysis tool

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393 Bug ID: 4393 Summary: Review Request: zoneminder - A camera monitoring and analysis tool Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 %description ZoneMinder is a set of applications which is intended to provide a complete solution allowing you to capture, analyze, record and monitor any cameras you have attached to a Linux based machine. It is designed to run on kernels which support the Video For Linux (V4L) interface and has been tested with cameras attached to BTTV cards, various USB cameras and IP network cameras. It is designed to support as many cameras as you can attach to your computer without too much degradation of performance. A little background. Zoneminder currently lives in the Fedora 25 repo and the repo at zmrepo.zoneminder.com, which I am the maintainer of. In conversation with the Fedora team, we agree that, due to zoneminder's ffmpeg dependencies, it will be removed from the Fedora repo moving forward. In my opinion, the best place for the zoneminder package to live is at RPMFusion, because some of zoneminder's dependencies already exist here. This is my first RPMFusion package. Note that I am also part of the upstream zoneminder development team, and I do have a member of the Fedora packaging team willing to support/sponsor me. It does look like I still need an RPMFusion sponsor though. Please note that zoneminder will currently build against the RPMFusion repo, but it will not install, due to several missing dependencies. I am in the process of learning how to get the following dependencies into Fedora and EPEL, or failing that, RPMFusion: cambozola perl-Class-Std-Fast perl-IO-Socket-Multicast perl-SOAP-WSDL perl-X10-ActiveHome perl-Astro-SunTime All of these packages currently exist in zmrepo. zoneminder rpm specfile: https://gist.github.com/knnniggett/cf2e4e2169ed8d4147b6367d6a60a843 The following SRPM will build on EL6 (i386, x86_64), EL7 (x86_64), and Fedora (i386,x86_64,armhfp): https://zmrepo.zoneminder.com/f/testing/25/SRPMS/zoneminder-1.30.1-1.fc25... Here is a complete rpmlint output: https://gist.github.com/knnniggett/e944c47a5cfdfe71cf68d3ac2366afe2 What follows is a line-by-line response to what rpmlint found: invalid-url Source0: ZoneMinder-1.30.1.tar.gz Because zoneminder uses git submodules, the easiest thing for me to do is create the tarball from my own local git repo. Fedora packaging guidelines state this method is acceptable. However, please advise if a different method would be preferred. non-readable /etc/zm/zm.conf 640 This config file contains the mysql database login credentials. Hence the reason for the 640 permissions. This is by design. dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/zoneminder/www/cambozola.jar ../../java/cambozola.jar Zoneminder expects the cambozola.jar file to exist within zoneminder's web root. Hence the purpose of the symlink. explicit-lib-dependency libcurl libcurl is one of the methods zoneminder uses to receive a stream from a camera. If memory serves, rpmbuild does not autodetect this. explicit-lib-dependency libjpeg-turbo This is to ensure we have the turbo jpeg library rather than the legacy jpeg library. Older el6 distros can have both so we want to make sure the turbo library is installed. no-manual-page-for-binary zmXXXXX.xx These entries are incorrect. Zoneminder uses pod2man to dynamically create man pages for its executables. all the rest items under zoneminder's api folder Zoneminder uses cakephp 2.8 and these entries are all part of that framework. I am hesitant to do anything about these entries because they are from a different project. Please advise. Whew! Lots of information here, but I still feel like I am forgetting something. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
51
0 / 0

[Bug 3328] New: Review request: pianobar - console-based client for the personalized online radio Pandora

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3328 Bug #: 3328 Summary: Review request: pianobar - console-based client for the personalized online radio Pandora Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/pianobar.spec SRPM: https://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/pianobar-2014.06.08-1.fc20.src.rpm pianobar is a free/open-source, console-based client for the personalized online radio Pandora Package is not eligible in Fedora because it requires ffmpeg-devel as a build requirement. $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-20-x86_64-rpmfusion/result/pianobar-2014.06.08-1.fc20.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [21:50:55|admiller@carbon(0) ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/pianobar-2014.06.08] $ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-20-x86_64-rpmfusion/result/pianobar-2014.06.08-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first RPMFusion package, I am currently a Fedora packager: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/maxamillion/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 9 months

1
35
0 / 0

[Bug 3746] New: kodi-pvr-hts - Kodi's Tvheadend HTSP client addon

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3746 Bug #: 3746 Summary: kodi-pvr-hts - Kodi's Tvheadend HTSP client addon Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-hts/kodi-pvr-hts.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-hts/kodi-pvr-hts-2.1... Description: Kodi's frontend for Tvheadend. Supports streaming of live TV & recordings, EPG, timers. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 10 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 3465] New: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3465 Bug #: 3465 Summary: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... Description: Dropbox extension for nautilus file manager Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 1 month

1
9
0 / 0

[Announce] RPM Fusion for EL is restored - EL7 support started

by Nicolas Chauvet

I'm please to announce that the RPM Fusion support for Enterprise Linux (RHEL,CentOS,SL) has been restored. The new Koji infra is now able to build packages for EL as free and nonfree repos (for some time already). Now it's possible for the packages built there to be pushed into the mirrors. Thx Xavier Bachelot, Orion Poplawski and others for heading the rebuilt of EL7 packages. You can find the related rpmfusion{free,nonfree}-release on the updated configuration page: https://rpmfusion.org/Configuration At this time the content is still located in the testing repository for EL7, the planis to move them from testing to stable in one or two weeks from now. While bootstrapping the EL7 repo, we've tried to look at existing work, specially from the nux repo. Unfortunately we haven't received any direct help from this contributor. So if you feel like some of your work depends on anything not yet available in RPM Fusion for EL. Please consider joining http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors. We welcome any contributors that enjoy working with others. Some packages rely on the EPEL repository to be available. Because of that, our release rpm have a mandatory requires for epel-release. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL For the record EL6 repo is provided as i686 and x86_64 whereas EL7 is only provided as x86_64 at this time. This lead to an issue with multilib packages in our infra (same as EPEL). So here is the possible workaround: If there is no specific arched dependencies (either binary only or because of limited BR) The best way is to build the same package on el6, I will also tag the build on el7, so both i686 and x86_64 build from el6 will be available on el7. This is what I expect to use for libtxc_dxtn (and steam eventually). As usual, if there is any issue, please report bugs into our https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org (choose EPEL component in our bugzilla) On a side note, given EL5 support will end in two months from now, it's unlikely that we will do any changes there anyway. -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 2 months

4
4
0 / 0

Introduction and a Question

by Sean Callaway

Good morning, My name is Sean Callaway and I'm a Linux SA in southern California. I currently am the maintainer of two packages for EPEL (openvpn-auth-ldap and re2c). I am interested in seeing about getting Discord, a gaming chat client, into rpmfusion-nonfree. I have a working package in my Copr (https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/seancallaway/discord/) and am getting ready to create my review request. I've read through the docs, but most of them are written for Fedora specifically and, as this is a binary release for nonfree, I'm not sure they apply fully. Either way, I'm left with at least the following question: what permission is required from Discord to have this included in RPMFusion? Is a developer's quick go-ahead (https://twitter.com/crmarsh/status/819615137531183105) enough? Thanks, - Sean

7 years, 2 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Bug 118] Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED |--- --- Comment #79 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> --- closed by mistake -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 118] Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #78 from Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com> --- (In reply to leigh scott from comment #77) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #70) > > Okay, I think we can close this review > > It can be closed when someone takes ownership. > > > > > Package approved. > > > > Package Review > > > > I see RF_ACCEPT but no one has claimed it @pkgdb! > > https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/request/package/ https://cinelerra-cv.org/download.php I think pack new version 5.1 which support HD etc. and not this old 2.3 May we should close this ticket with wontfix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2017