Re: EL7 status?
by Xavier Bachelot
On 02/01/2017 17:32, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> 2017-01-02 17:06 GMT+01:00 Karel Volný <kvolny(a)redhat.com>:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>>> Afaiu, everything is ready for EL7, but no push has happened yet.
>>> Nicolas is waiting for more packages to be available, most notably ffmpeg
>>> I guess.
>>> There is a mash tree somewhere, but I don't have the url at hand.
>>> Also, using 'rfpkg' to build for EL7 worked for me.
>>
>>
>> it doesn't work for me, because I need ... ffmpeg :-)
>
> The current consensus is to have ffmpeg 2.8x in epel7 "by default".
> Then it will be possible to have a ffmpeg-latest or ffmpeg3 next (I
> still prefer the former as it will be relevant for both epel and
> fedora).
> That been said it will only be allowed to link to the default ffmpeg
> (2.8x) to avoid relinking error when a process has different version
> of ffmpeg libs linked.
>
ffmpeg has now been built, thanks to Nicolas.
You guys can all go wild, hit the builders heavily and help with turning
up RPM Fusion for EL7 into a reality...
Regards,
Xavier
7 years, 10 months
Re: x265 2.2 in rawhide
by Sérgio Basto
On Ter, 2017-01-03 at 13:26 +0100, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Hi,
> I've just updated x265 to 2.2 (released Dec 26th)
Note that f25 wasn't update to 2.1 near at GA, the version in F25 is
x265-1.9 ...
Cheers,
--
Sérgio M. B.
7 years, 10 months
Re: [Bug 3922] Merge commit/fork and branch avidemux from master to
el6
by Sérgio Basto
Hi Richard, I'm sending this message to devel ML .
I had fixed on type on mock-rpmfusion-free-25.1 version [1] , made a
scratch build of rpmfusion-free-25.2 with this build ,
on epel-6-x86_64-rpmfusion_free only
No matching package to install: 'x265-devel'
No matching package to install: 'nvenc-devel'
if you edit /etc/mock/epel-7-x86_64-rpmfusion_free.cfg and enable repo
local-free , btw you may also disable rpmfusion-free-updates
and rpmfusion-free-updates-testing
I just get:
No matching package to install: 'nvenc-devel'
[1] http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=69536
Cheers,
On Qui, 2017-01-05 at 02:30 +0000, RPM Fusion Bugzilla wrote:
> Comment # 7 on bug 3922 from Richard
> The original patch may address some of these but there are several
> build
> requirements missing...
>
> Error: No Package found for a52dec-devel >= 0.7.4
> Error: No Package found for faad2-devel >= 2.0
> Error: No Package found for lame-devel >= 3.96.1
> Error: No Package found for libdca-devel
> Error: No Package found for nvenc-devel
> Error: No Package found for opencore-amr-devel
> Error: No Package found for twolame-devel
> Error: No Package found for x264-devel
> Error: No Package found for x265-devel
> Error: No Package found for xvidcore-devel >= 1.0.2
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
--
Sérgio M. B.
7 years, 10 months
[Bug 4155] New: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4155
Bug #: 4155
Summary: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of
the G.729 codec
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: manisandro(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729.spec
SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm
Description: Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec
Not in Fedora because: "ITU G729 usage is governed by a patent license to be
acquired from Sipro Lab"
Rpmlint:
$ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source,
Open-source, Outsource
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open source,
open-source, outsource
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source,
Open-source, Outsource
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open
source, open-source, outsource
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
bcg729.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/bcg729/COPYING
$ rpmlint bcg729-devel-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/encoder.h
bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/decoder.h
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 51 errors, 7 warnings.
The incorrect FSF address was reported upstream at [1]. Remaining issues are
non-issues.
[1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/linphone-developers/2016-07/index.html
This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora sponsored packager
(FAS: smani)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 10 months