Re: ffmpeg-1.2 update

2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)gmail.com&gt; > W dniu 18.03.2013 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet pisze: > > 2013/3/18 Julian Sikorski > > <belegdol(a)gmail.com > > <mailto:belegdol@gmail.com>> > > > > Dear all, > > > > ffmpeg-1.2 was released recently. I have run a round of dep > rebuilds and > > the only packages that failed to rebuild were bino, lightspark and > > dvbcut. None of these failures point directly to ffmpeg though. > > I'd opt for pushing this into devel and F-19 ASAP, and then maybe > even > > to F-18 - but that one should be carefully considered. > > rpmsodiff output is attached. > > > > devel is rawhide aka fedora-20 right now, Any update must pass rawhide > > usability tests before anything else. > > As always I would like to have a sum-up of the ABI changes involved if > any. > > > > I'm not fundamentally against having ffmpeg-1.2 in branched/F-19 at a > > later point. I just know some later ffmpeg update was locked by vlc > > because they will build but the rework needed to make it run will be > > done in the next vlc, not vlc bugfix. > > > > Nicolas (kwizart) > > > > Ps: I also don't have seen much mplayer update recently > > > > > > > > > As you can see from the rpmsodiff output, only one symbol was removed. > I should apologize, I've miss to see the rpmdiff output was attached in