Re: using rpmfusion repo during fedora install

On 08.11.2008 05:01, David Timms wrote: > Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> On 07.11.2008 15:03, David Timms wrote: >>>> But note, the better question would have been: Does out comps.xml >>>> have the right format? But I think it has, as it works just fine with >>>> stand-alone pirut (if one complies and runs the F8 version on rawhide) >>> So I should continue to try and work out where the issue actually lies ? >> I'd be glad, yeah. But note, I'll try to run some test myself as well; I >> plan to open a bug in bugzilla.redhat.com when I had a chance to look >> deeper into this. >> >> But note, we can't be really sure our comps files is correct. But I hope >> it is. > I don't see any test scripts etc for comps.xml {other than xml tests}. > OK, for 9: > http://download1.rpmfusion.org/free/fedora/updates/9/i386/repodata/804f17... > [...] > That seems to indicate that the group would include the "(RPM Fusion > Free)" text, and be different to the Fedora group, which contradicts > what you said earlier about the group being undifferentiated from Fedora. That was a workaround that was used in F-8 and F-9 -- but the plan was to get rid of that workaround for rawhide and get the real soltuion in place, hence the comps.xml for rawhide looks quite different.