Re: Introduction
On 27.11.2008 13:27, Paul Howarth wrote:
Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 25.11.2008 12:57, Paul Howarth wrote:
>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> On 25.11.2008 11:48, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>> Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>> On 24.11.2008 15:38, Paul Howarth wrote:
>>>>>> Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, November 23, 2008 8:56 am, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 23.11.2008 16:16, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>>> I did struggle to find a comprehensive list of what's available
>>>> though - is there a repoview somewhere? If there is, I think it
>>>> would be worth adding a link to it
>>>> from the wiki somewhere that casual browsers might find it.
>>> Yeah, as mentioned some minutes ago in
>>>
http://lists.rpmfusion.org/pipermail/rpmfusion-developers/2008-November/0...
>>> There is a lot of things that need improvement. Our docs are one area
>>> where we really suck.
>> OK, I'll try to fix things where I see them; I trust there are no ACL
>> restrictions like (parts of) the Fedora wiki?
> No, the Wiki is open to all users that created an account.
I created a PackageList page with links to the repoview index pages for
each repo.
Thx for that. Seems David Timms gave it a try as well. I merged the two
variants, (hopefully) improved things and put them on the RPM Fusion
front side (which is I modified in some other areas as well -- but there
is still more work needed afaics..). Check out
http://rpmfusion.org/
And tell me if you like it.
Some things I noticed:
1. Repoview for F10 says it's "Development" rather than "Fedora
10"
Hmmm. I simply copied development over to F10 without generating the
repoview data again. Will look into that.
2. The updates repos for Fedora 10 and EL5 are empty and don't
have
repoview indexes. Does repoview not behave sanely in empty repos?
Looks like it -- it doesn't do anything for empty repos.
3. The main release repos for Fedora 8, Fedora 9, and EL5 are empty,
with all of the content being in the updates repos. Is this ever likely
to change?
For F8 and F9: no. For EL5: not sure yet.
>> (and unblock me from denyhosts - 212.56.100.58).
> Will do.
Still seem to be blocked:
Xavier was helpful here afaics (and he is the better one to talk to for
things like that). Hope you two get it sorted out.
Cu
knurd