[Bug 985] New: Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985
Summary: Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: goeran(a)uddeborg.se
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
European digital radio & television uses the DVB standard to broadcast its
data. Project X gives you a look behind the transmissions and tries its best
to handle & repair many stream types and shows what went wrong on reception.
In particular, it is able to demultiplex the different streams in a
transmission.
It can not be included in Fedora for patent reasons, see the thread at
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-April/msg00020.html
Rpmlint is happy except that it complains about missing buildroot tag. But I'm
only aiming for F12 and the guidelines doesn't require any such tag any more.
(Since it is ignored anyway.)
This is the first time I package for RPM Fusion. (But I have packaged for
Fedora before, although just a single package, ttf2pt1, so I'm already
sponsored.)
Spec: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX.spec
Source: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX-0.90.4.00-3.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 7 months
[Bug 1351] New: Review request: frogatto - An old-school 2D platform game
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1351
Summary: Review request: frogatto - An old-school 2D platform
game
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/frogatto.spec
http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/frogatto-1.0-1.fc12.nosrc.rpm
Because of the large size of the upstream source package and the small size of
my web space I made a nosrc.rpm.
Please download the tarball with:
$ spectool -g frogatto.spec
* Description:
An old-school 2D platform game, starring a certain quixotic frog. Frogatto
has gorgeous, high-end pixel art, pumping arcade tunes, and all the gameplay
nuance of a classic console title. Run and jump over pits and enemies. Grab
enemies with your tongue, swallow them, and then spit them out at other enemies
as projectiles! Fight dangerous bosses, and solve vexing puzzles. Collect coins
and use them to buy upgrades and new abilities in the store. Talk to characters
in game, and work to unravel Big Bad Milgram's plot against the townsfolk!
* Why not in Fedora?
This package is not eligible for Fedora because its data are not
released under a Fedora acceptable license ("Good Licenses"):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Content_Licenses
Upstream has given its explicit consensus in packaging Frogatto for
RPM Fusion.
* Rpmlint:
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/frogatto-1.0-1.fc12.nosrc.rpm
frogatto.nosrc: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play,
game-play, nameplate
frogatto.nosrc: W: invalid-license proprietary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/frogatto-1.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm
frogatto.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play,
game-play, nameplate
frogatto.x86_64: W: invalid-license proprietary
rpmli1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint
/home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/frogatto-debuginfo-1.0-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm
frogatto-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license proprietary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
License is not valid for Fedora but good for RPM Fusion (nonfree repository).
Ignore the spelling of gameplay - it is correct AFAIK.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 7 months
[Bug 1278] New: Review Request: mpg123 - MPEG audio player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1278
Summary: Review Request: mpg123 - MPEG audio player
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/mpg123.spec
SRPM: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/mpg123-1.12.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Real time command line MPEG audio player for Layer 1, 2 and Layer3.
Not eligible for Fedora because it contains mp3 code.
rpmlint:
libmpg123-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmpg -> lib
mpg, lib-mpg, Librium
mpg123-plugins-extras.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libmpg -> lib
mpg, lib-mpg, Librium
mpg123-plugins-extras.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmpg ->
lib mpg, lib-mpg, Librium
mpg123-plugins-extras.x86_64: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
All of these are false positives / not relevant.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
[Bug 461] New: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461
Summary: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries
and executables
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif.spec
SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif-2.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm
Description:
This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the
Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically
linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm".
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr
This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the
Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically
linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm".
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr
This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the
Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically
linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm".
You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr
$ rpmlint openmotif-devel-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
openmotif-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint openmotif-demos-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/fontsel/creation-c.c
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/earth/earth.c
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/wsm/wsm_cb.h
openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/Xm/todo/io.c
$ rpmlint openmotif-mwm-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
openmotif-mwm.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
Why not in Fedora?
Package contains a nonfree license:
Plese refer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif
Known issues:
opemmotif-devel has a conflict with lesstif-devel. But mesa-libGLw-devel
depends on lesstif-devel. So we need a virtual provides 'motif-devel' on
lesstif-devel and mesa-libGLw-devel.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 8 months
RPM Fusion for EPEL-6
by Lubomir Rintel
Hi,
I'm seriously interested in maintaining my RPM Fusion packages for EL-6
(actually, I'd be glad if we had a multimedia stack for it as well),
given I'll probably end up with an el6 desktop.
There are no branches done currently, nor builders are set up and I'm
not to sure what do I need to get them. Can I be helpful here? If yes,
how?
Thanks in advance,
Lubo
--
Flash is the Web2.0 version of blink and animated gifs.
-- Stephen Smoogen
13 years, 8 months
Web hosting?
by Andrea Musuruane
Hi all!
I've just packaged Frogatto (http://www.frogatto.com/) but SRPM is
about 130Mb and it is by far bigger than the current available web
storage I have. Do someone have some suggestion? Or maybe some free
space? ;-)
Thanks!
Regards,
Andrea.
13 years, 9 months
Fwd: Build Error (Job 7702): mame-0_139-1_fc13 on fedora-13-rpmfusion_nonfree
by Julian Sikorski
Dear all,
Were there any changes on builder.wilsonet.com recently which might have
affected the amount of ram/swap available? Apparently this file is a
beast and insufficient memory will manifest in a manner similar to what
happened here.
Julian
------ Wiadomość oryginalna ------
Temat: Build Error (Job 7702): mame-0_139-1_fc13 on
fedora-13-rpmfusion_nonfree
Data: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:22:19 +0200 (CEST)
Nadawca: rpmfusion-buildsys(a)lists.rpmfusion.org
Adresat: belegdol(a)gmail.com
Job failed on arch x86_64
Build logs may be found at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-13-rpmfusion_nonfree/7702-mame-...
-------------------------------------------------
src/emu/inputseq.h:196: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
integer expressions
src/emu/inputseq.h:197: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
integer expressions
In file included from src/emu/emu.h:90,
from src/emu/cpu/tms57002/tms57002.c:1:
src/emu/devcpu.h: In member function 'virtual const
address_space_config* legacy_cpu_device_config::memory_space_config(int)
const':
src/emu/devcpu.h:441: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned
integer expressions
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:5448: Warning: end of file not at end of a line;
newline inserted
{standard input}:5572: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:5572: Error: open CFI at the end of file; missing
.cfi_endproc directive
gcc: Internal error: Killed (program cc1plus)
Please submit a full bug report.
See <http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla> for instructions.
make: *** [obj/sdl/mame/emu/cpu/tms57002/tms57002.o] Error 1
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VQlPFp (%build)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.VQlPFp (%build)
Child returncode was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/mame.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line
70, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 333, in do
raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for output.\n
# %s" % (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target x86_64 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/mame.spec']
LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED
13 years, 9 months
